Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1313897
| From | Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts |
| Date | 2016-01-21 06:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qTfYK-Ea-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qSQnE-8bo-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSQnF-8bo-51@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2016/1/20 9:42, Feng Wu wrote:
> Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts, As an
> example, modern Intel CPUs in server platform use this method to
> handle lowest-priority interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - Fix a bug for sparse topologies, in that case, vcpu_id is not equal
> to the return value got by kvm_get_vcpu().
> - Remove unnecessary check in fast irq delivery patch.
> - print a error message only once for each guest when we find hardware
> disabled LAPIC during interrupt injection.
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 +++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 44adbb8..5054810 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -754,6 +754,8 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>
> bool irqchip_split;
> u8 nr_reserved_ioapic_pins;
> +
> + int disabled_lapic_found;
> };
>
> struct kvm_vm_stat {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
> index 8fc89ef..062e907 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #include "lapic.h"
>
> #include "hyperv.h"
> +#include "x86.h"
>
> static int kvm_set_pic_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
> struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, int level,
> @@ -55,8 +56,10 @@ static int kvm_set_ioapic_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
> int kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
> struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq, unsigned long *dest_map)
> {
> - int i, r = -1;
> + int i, r = -1, idx = 0;
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, *lowest = NULL;
> + unsigned long dest_vcpu_bitmap[BITS_TO_LONGS(KVM_MAX_VCPUS)];
> + unsigned int dest_vcpus = 0;
>
> if (irq->dest_mode == 0 && irq->dest_id == 0xff &&
> kvm_lowest_prio_delivery(irq)) {
> @@ -67,6 +70,8 @@ int kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
> if (kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast(kvm, src, irq, &r, dest_map))
> return r;
>
> + memset(dest_vcpu_bitmap, 0, sizeof(dest_vcpu_bitmap));
> +
> kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> if (!kvm_apic_present(vcpu))
> continue;
> @@ -80,13 +85,25 @@ int kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
> r = 0;
> r += kvm_apic_set_irq(vcpu, irq, dest_map);
> } else if (kvm_lapic_enabled(vcpu)) {
> - if (!lowest)
> - lowest = vcpu;
> - else if (kvm_apic_compare_prio(vcpu, lowest) < 0)
> - lowest = vcpu;
> + if (!kvm_vector_hashing_enabled()) {
> + if (!lowest)
> + lowest = vcpu;
> + else if (kvm_apic_compare_prio(vcpu, lowest) < 0)
> + lowest = vcpu;
> + } else {
> + __set_bit(i, dest_vcpu_bitmap);
> + dest_vcpus++;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> + if (dest_vcpus != 0) {
> + idx = kvm_vector_2_index(irq->vector, dest_vcpus,
> + dest_vcpu_bitmap, KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
> +
> + lowest = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, idx - 1);
> + }
> +
> if (lowest)
> r = kvm_apic_set_irq(lowest, irq, dest_map);
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 36591fa..e1a449da 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -675,6 +675,22 @@ bool kvm_apic_match_dest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_lapic *source,
> }
> }
>
> +int kvm_vector_2_index(u32 vector, u32 dest_vcpus,
> + const unsigned long *bitmap, u32 bitmap_size)
> +{
> + u32 mod;
> + int i, idx = 0;
> +
> + mod = vector % dest_vcpus;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i <= mod; i++) {
> + idx = find_next_bit(bitmap, bitmap_size, idx) + 1;
> + BUG_ON(idx > bitmap_size);
> + }
> +
> + return idx;
> +}
> +
> bool kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
> struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq, int *r, unsigned long *dest_map)
> {
> @@ -727,21 +743,51 @@ bool kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
>
> dst = map->logical_map[cid];
>
> - if (kvm_lowest_prio_delivery(irq)) {
> + if (!kvm_lowest_prio_delivery(irq))
> + goto set_irq;
> +
> + if (!kvm_vector_hashing_enabled()) {
> int l = -1;
> for_each_set_bit(i, &bitmap, 16) {
> if (!dst[i])
> continue;
> if (l < 0)
> l = i;
> - else if (kvm_apic_compare_prio(dst[i]->vcpu, dst[l]->vcpu) < 0)
> + else if (kvm_apic_compare_prio(dst[i]->vcpu,
> + dst[l]->vcpu) < 0)
> l = i;
> }
> -
> bitmap = (l >= 0) ? 1 << l : 0;
> + } else {
> + int idx = 0;
> + unsigned int dest_vcpus = 0;
> +
> + dest_vcpus = hweight16(bitmap);
> + if (dest_vcpus == 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> + idx = kvm_vector_2_index(irq->vector,
> + dest_vcpus, &bitmap, 16);
> +
> + /*
> + * We may find a hardware disabled LAPIC here, if that
> + * is the case, print out a error message once for each
> + * guest and return.
> + */
> + if (!dst[idx-1] &&
> + (kvm->arch.disabled_lapic_found == 0)) {
> + kvm->arch.disabled_lapic_found = 1;
> + printk(KERN_ERR
> + "Disabled LAPIC found during irq injection\n");
> + goto out;
What does "goto out" mean? Inject successfully or fail? According the
value of ret which is set to ture here, it means inject successfully but
i = -1.
> + }
> +
> + bitmap = 0;
> + __set_bit(idx-1, &bitmap);
We can reuse the code like:
bitmap = (idx > 0) ? 1 << (idx - 1) : 0;
> }
> }
>
> +set_irq:
> for_each_set_bit(i, &bitmap, 16) {
> if (!dst[i])
> continue;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> index 41bdb35..d864601 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> @@ -175,4 +175,6 @@ void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> bool kvm_intr_is_single_vcpu_fast(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq,
> struct kvm_vcpu **dest_vcpu);
> +int kvm_vector_2_index(u32 vector, u32 dest_vcpus,
> + const unsigned long *bitmap, u32 bitmap_size);
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 4244c2b..47daf77 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ module_param(tsc_tolerance_ppm, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> unsigned int __read_mostly lapic_timer_advance_ns = 0;
> module_param(lapic_timer_advance_ns, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
>
> +bool __read_mostly enable_vector_hashing = 1;
> +module_param(enable_vector_hashing, bool, S_IRUGO);
> +
> static bool __read_mostly backwards_tsc_observed = false;
>
> #define KVM_NR_SHARED_MSRS 16
> @@ -8370,6 +8373,12 @@ int kvm_arch_update_irqfd_routing(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq,
> return kvm_x86_ops->update_pi_irte(kvm, host_irq, guest_irq, set);
> }
>
> +bool kvm_vector_hashing_enabled(void)
> +{
> + return enable_vector_hashing;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vector_hashing_enabled);
> +
> EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_exit);
> EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_fast_mmio);
> EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_inj_virq);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> index f2afa5f..04bd0f9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ int kvm_mtrr_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 data);
> int kvm_mtrr_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *pdata);
> bool kvm_mtrr_check_gfn_range_consistency(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
> int page_num);
> +bool kvm_vector_hashing_enabled(void);
>
> #define KVM_SUPPORTED_XCR0 (XFEATURE_MASK_FP | XFEATURE_MASK_SSE \
> | XFEATURE_MASK_YMM | XFEATURE_MASK_BNDREGS \
>
--
best regards
yang
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3 0/4] VT-d posted-interrupts follow ups Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com> - 2016-01-20 03:10 +0100
[PATCH v3 4/4] KVM/VMX: Add host irq information in trace event when updating IRTE for posted interrupts Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com> - 2016-01-20 03:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM/VMX: Add host irq information in trace event when updating IRTE for posted interrupts Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-01-21 21:20 +0100
[PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com> - 2016-01-20 03:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 06:30 +0100
RE: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com> - 2016-01-21 06:40 +0100
RE: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com> - 2016-01-21 06:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 07:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 07:10 +0100
RE: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com> - 2016-01-21 07:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 06:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts "rkrcmar@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-01-21 18:30 +0100
RE: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com> - 2016-01-22 03:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 05:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts "rkrcmar@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-01-22 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-01-21 21:00 +0100
RE: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com> - 2016-01-22 06:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts Radim Krcmár <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-01-22 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-01-25 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts Radim Krcmár <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-01-25 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-01-25 17:20 +0100
RE: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com> - 2016-01-26 02:20 +0100
csiph-web