Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1315301

Re: fs: sandboxed process brings host down

From Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: fs: sandboxed process brings host down
Date 2016-01-22 22:40 +0100
Message-ID <qTRB1-1oj-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qTR7Y-19M-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTRrk-1iu-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:06:14PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> While running syzkaller fuzzer I hit the following problem. Supervisor
>> process sandboxes worker processes that do random activities with
>> CLONE_NEWUSER | CLONE_NEWNS | CLONE_NEWPID | CLONE_NEWUTS |
>> CLONE_NEWNET | CLONE_NEWIPC | CLONE_IO, setrlimit, chroot, etc.
>> Because of that worker process gains ability to bring whole machine
>> down (does not happen without the sandbox).
>
> AFAICS, what you are doing is essentially mount --rbind / / in infinite
> loop in luserns.  Which ends up eating all memory.  There's any number
> of ways to do the same.  We can play whack-a-mole with them until the
> kernel is completely ossified with accounting code of different sorts.
> Or one can disable userns and be done with that.

My 2GB VM dies at around just 10-th iteration, is it normal?
Each iteration consumes several hundreds of megs of kernel memory. And
there seems to be exponential slowdown at around 5-th iteration.
I understand that there can be lots of forms of a local DoS. But there
seems to be something pathological about this particular one. And it
happens only with sandboxing that is meant to reduce DoS
possibilities...

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: fs: sandboxed process brings host down Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-22 22:30 +0100
  Re: fs: sandboxed process brings host down Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-01-22 22:40 +0100
    Re: fs: sandboxed process brings host down Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-22 23:00 +0100
      Re: fs: sandboxed process brings host down Robert Święcki <robert@swiecki.net> - 2016-01-22 23:40 +0100
  Re: fs: sandboxed process brings host down Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2016-01-22 22:50 +0100

csiph-web