Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1315301
| From | Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: fs: sandboxed process brings host down |
| Date | 2016-01-22 22:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qTRB1-1oj-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qTR7Y-19M-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTRrk-1iu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:06:14PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> While running syzkaller fuzzer I hit the following problem. Supervisor >> process sandboxes worker processes that do random activities with >> CLONE_NEWUSER | CLONE_NEWNS | CLONE_NEWPID | CLONE_NEWUTS | >> CLONE_NEWNET | CLONE_NEWIPC | CLONE_IO, setrlimit, chroot, etc. >> Because of that worker process gains ability to bring whole machine >> down (does not happen without the sandbox). > > AFAICS, what you are doing is essentially mount --rbind / / in infinite > loop in luserns. Which ends up eating all memory. There's any number > of ways to do the same. We can play whack-a-mole with them until the > kernel is completely ossified with accounting code of different sorts. > Or one can disable userns and be done with that. My 2GB VM dies at around just 10-th iteration, is it normal? Each iteration consumes several hundreds of megs of kernel memory. And there seems to be exponential slowdown at around 5-th iteration. I understand that there can be lots of forms of a local DoS. But there seems to be something pathological about this particular one. And it happens only with sandboxing that is meant to reduce DoS possibilities...
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: fs: sandboxed process brings host down Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-22 22:30 +0100
Re: fs: sandboxed process brings host down Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-01-22 22:40 +0100
Re: fs: sandboxed process brings host down Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-22 23:00 +0100
Re: fs: sandboxed process brings host down Robert Święcki <robert@swiecki.net> - 2016-01-22 23:40 +0100
Re: fs: sandboxed process brings host down Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2016-01-22 22:50 +0100
csiph-web