Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1315089

Re: wireless-drivers: random cleanup patches piling up

From Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: wireless-drivers: random cleanup patches piling up
Date 2016-01-22 17:00 +0100
Message-ID <qTMhZ-62g-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qTyf0-4I6-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTyf0-4I6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTJ0K-3Xp-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qTLFg-5N3-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> writes:

> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 02:21:20PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 16:58 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> 
>> >> I have quite a lot of random cleanup patches from new developers waiting
>> >> in my queue:
>> >> 
>> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/?state=10&delegate=25621&order=date
>> >> 
>> >> (Not all of them are cleanup patches, there are also few patches
>> >> deferred due to other reasons, but you get the idea.)
>> >> 
>> >> These cleanup patches usually take quite a lot of my time and I'm
>> >> starting to doubt the benefit, compared to the time needed to dig
>> >> through them and figuring out what to apply. And this is of course time
>> >> away from other patches, so it's slowing down "real" development.
>> >> 
>> >> I really don't know what to do. Part of me is saying that I just should
>> >> drop them unless it's reviewed by a more experienced developer but on
>> >> the other hand this is a good way get new developers onboard.
>> >> 
>> >> What others think? Are these kind of patches useful?
>> >
>> > Some yes, mostly not really.
>> >
>> > While whitespace style patches have some small value,
>> > very few of the new contributors that use tools like
>> > "scripts/checkpatch.pl -f" on various kernel filesĀ 
>> > actually continue on to submit actual defect fixing
>> > or optimization or code clarity patches.
>> 
>> That's also my experience from maintaining wireless-drivers for a year,
>> this seems to be a "hit and run" type of phenomenon.
>
> Should we be looking for someone to run a "wireless-driver-cleanups"
> tree?  They could handle the cleanups and trivial stuff, and send
> you a pull request a couple of times per release...?

Not a bad idea! But I don't think we need a separate tree as applying
patches from patchwork is easy. It should be doable that we add an
account to patchwork and whenever I see a this type of trivial cleanup
patch I'll assign it to the cleanup maintainer and whenever he/she
thinks it's ready he assigns the patch back to me and I'll apply it.

The only difficult part is finding a victim/volunteer to
do that ;)

-- 
Kalle Valo

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: wireless-drivers: random cleanup patches piling up Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-01-22 02:00 +0100
  Re: wireless-drivers: random cleanup patches piling up Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-01-22 08:40 +0100
  Re: wireless-drivers: random cleanup patches piling up Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2016-01-22 13:30 +0100
    Re: wireless-drivers: random cleanup patches piling up "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> - 2016-01-22 16:20 +0100
      Re: wireless-drivers: random cleanup patches piling up Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2016-01-22 17:00 +0100
        Re: wireless-drivers: random cleanup patches piling up Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 06:30 +0100
      Re: wireless-drivers: random cleanup patches piling up Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-01-22 19:10 +0100

csiph-web