Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6

From	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6
Date	2016-01-20 14:30 +0100
Message-ID	<qT0ZI-73U-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <qSMk1-59V-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSMtJ-5dk-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSMDo-5wa-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSMWJ-5DX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSN6q-5HE-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Em Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:31:01PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf escreveu:
> On 2016.01.19 at 19:28 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:00:50PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf escreveu:
> > > On 2016.01.19 at 21:58 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:40:18PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > > On 2016.01.19 at 21:32 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > > > gcc 6 warns about various things in tools/perf  and with -Werror
> > > > > > these turn into build failures.  One of them is a real though not
> > > > > > very serious bug.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I've already send patches for 1,2 and 4. See:
> > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/460
> > > > > 
> > > > > Not sure what happened with them. Also your patch number 4 is wrong, you
> > > > > should just delete the semicolon.
> > > > 
> > > > I think that the busy-wait, intentional or not, may be a necessary
> > > > part of the test case.
> > > 
> > > Well, the author of the code thinks otherwise:
> > > 
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/269
> > 
> > Right, I saw those and I think I haven't processed them because I was
> > waiting for those to be broken up in separate patches after I read
> > Ingo's comment about one of them fixing up a real bug, a part that the
> > original autor, mfleming even acked, could you please break it down into
> > multiple patches?
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/460
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/461
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/465

And you had done that already, my bad, going thru them now.

- Arnaldo

Thread

[PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-19 22:40 +0100
  [PATCH perf 4/4] perf tests: Delete mis-indented dead code that  causes build failure with gcc 6 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-19 22:40 +0100
  [PATCH perf 3/4] perf tools: Fix unused variables:  x86_{32,64}_regoffset_table Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-19 22:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH perf 3/4] perf tools: Fix unused variables:  x86_{32,64}_regoffset_table Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-01-20 15:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH perf 3/4] perf tools: Fix unused variables: x86_{32,64}_regoffset_table "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2016-01-21 05:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH perf 3/4] perf tools: Fix unused variables:  x86_{32,64}_regoffset_table Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-01-21 16:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH perf 3/4] perf tools: Fix unused variables:  x86_{32,64}_regoffset_table Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-01-21 16:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH perf 3/4] perf tools: Fix unused variables: x86_{32,64}_regoffset_table "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2016-01-22 02:40 +0100
        RE: [PATCH perf 3/4] perf tools: Fix unused variables:  x86_{32,64}_regoffset_table 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU，MASAMI   <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> - 2016-01-22 07:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH perf 3/4] perf tools: Fix unused variables: x86_{32,64}_regoffset_table "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2016-01-22 07:30 +0100
            RE: [PATCH perf 3/4] perf tools: Fix unused variables:  x86_{32,64}_regoffset_table 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU，MASAMI   <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> - 2016-01-22 09:10 +0100
  [PATCH perf 2/4] perf top: Fix behaviour of Shift-Tab in annotated  view with nothing focussed Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-19 22:40 +0100
  [PATCH perf 1/4] perf tools: Fix wrong indentation and build failure  with gcc 6 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-19 22:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6 Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de> - 2016-01-19 22:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-19 23:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-19 23:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6 Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de> - 2016-01-19 23:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-01-19 23:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6 Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de> - 2016-01-19 23:40 +0100
            Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-01-20 14:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-01-19 23:40 +0100
            Re: [PATCH perf 0/4] Build fixes for gcc 6 Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de> - 2016-01-19 23:50 +0100

csiph-web