Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1311680
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices |
| Date | 2016-01-18 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qSltv-3KT-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qS7Ad-2zb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSji1-1ZW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSjUK-2vA-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSke7-2DG-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSknL-2GX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote: > > > On 18/01/16 15:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Monday, January 18, 2016 03:23:18 PM Sudeep Holla wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 06:11:38 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >>>>> >>>>> When probing platform drivers let's check if corresponding devices have >>>>> "wakeup-source" property defined (either in device tree, ACPI, or >>>>> static >>>>> platform properties) and automatically enable such devices as wakeup >>>>> sources for the system. This will help us standardize on the name for >>>>> this >>>>> property and reduce amount of boilerplate code in the drivers. >>>> >>>> >>>> ACPI has other ways of telling the OS that the device is wakeup-capable, >>>> but I guess the property in question can be used too (as long as it is >>>> consistent with the other methods). >>>> >>> >>> Just curious to know what you mean when you say this property can also >>> be used with ACPI. Do you mean we could use "wakeup-source" DSD ? >> >> >> Yes. >> >>> If so, won't that go against rule for DSD (i.e we *should not* bypass the >>> existing mechanisms defined by the ACPI, e.g. _SxW in this case) >> >> >> Not necessarily. >> >> What if the device doesn't use ACPI PM and still can wake up the system? >> > > May be I don't understand the exact configuration you are referring, but > if you don't use ACPI PM, how will that system enter sleep states ? > IIUC you are referring suspend-to-idle case only here which doesn't > require any ACPI _Sx methods, which make sense. That plus PM on HW-reduced ACPI platforms where GPIOs can be used for system wakeup in principle (although admittedly I have no experience with such platforms, so this is just a theory). > But still I don't see a strong reason to provide an alternate method to > specify the same information. Firmware responsible for ACPI tables have > to specify this DSD in question, instead it can use the existing > mechanism in ACPI. We actually don't use _SxW to determine whether or not devices are wakeup-capable. We look at _PRW and we set "wakeup-capable" if it is present and the contents is valid. > Let me know if I am missing some information about the systems you are > referring ? That said I'm actually quite unsure about the property suggested by Dmitry, but let me reply to him on that. :-) Thanks, Rafael
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-01-18 06:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 07:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-01-18 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-18 15:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-01-18 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-18 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-01-18 17:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-01-18 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-01-18 18:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-01-18 23:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 02:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-01-20 03:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-01-20 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-01-21 00:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 01:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] driver-core: platform: automatically mark wakeup devices "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-01-26 17:50 +0100
csiph-web