Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1311620
| From | Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig |
| Date | 2016-01-18 16:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qSke5-2DG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <qSiFl-1J1-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSiP0-1Nw-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSji2-1ZW-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSjrI-23m-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSke5-2DG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> writes: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 02:51:00PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> I understand and disagree. I think you're being overzealous in trying >> to bludgeon people into doing things the way you think they should be >> done. > > So I did explain why it is better to do microcode updates from the > initrd. And nowhere in that explanation I am "bludgeoning" people into > doing things the way I want. Which is silly, I'd never even *think* of > wanting to do that - I have enough other shit to deal with. Forcing users to press a damn key on the keyboard after your pointless warning message sure feels like bludgeoning to me. >> From the point of view of the actual update mechanism, what difference >> does it make where the microcode data was retrieved from? If you want >> to warn about what you consider "unsafe" updates, do that when the >> update happens instead. With this patch, simply enabling BLK_DEV_INITRD >> will shut up the warning even if an initrd is never actually used. >> Also, what do modules have to do with anything? > > This reads like your mail from a couple of days ago. Which leads me to > think that you haven't understood at all what I've been writing this > whole time. Clearly you didn't explain it very well. -- Måns Rullgård
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig Thomas Voegtle <tv@lio96.de> - 2016-01-18 14:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2016-01-18 15:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-18 15:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2016-01-18 15:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2016-01-18 15:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-18 16:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-18 16:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2016-01-18 16:50 +0100
csiph-web