Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1311620

Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig

From Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig
Date 2016-01-18 16:50 +0100
Message-ID <qSke5-2DG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <qSiFl-1J1-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSiP0-1Nw-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSji2-1ZW-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSjrI-23m-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSke5-2DG-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> writes:

> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 02:51:00PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> I understand and disagree.  I think you're being overzealous in trying
>> to bludgeon people into doing things the way you think they should be
>> done.
>
> So I did explain why it is better to do microcode updates from the
> initrd. And nowhere in that explanation I am "bludgeoning" people into
> doing things the way I want. Which is silly, I'd never even *think* of
> wanting to do that - I have enough other shit to deal with.

Forcing users to press a damn key on the keyboard after your pointless
warning message sure feels like bludgeoning to me.

>> From the point of view of the actual update mechanism, what difference
>> does it make where the microcode data was retrieved from?  If you want
>> to warn about what you consider "unsafe" updates, do that when the
>> update happens instead.  With this patch, simply enabling BLK_DEV_INITRD
>> will shut up the warning even if an initrd is never actually used.
>> Also, what do modules have to do with anything?
>
> This reads like your mail from a couple of days ago. Which leads me to
> think that you haven't understood at all what I've been writing this
> whole time.

Clearly you didn't explain it very well.

-- 
Måns Rullgård

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during  oldconfig Thomas Voegtle <tv@lio96.de> - 2016-01-18 14:40 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during  oldconfig Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2016-01-18 15:10 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-18 15:20 +0100
      Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during  oldconfig Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2016-01-18 15:30 +0100
      Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during  oldconfig Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2016-01-18 15:50 +0100
        Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-18 16:00 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2016-01-18 16:50 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during  oldconfig Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2016-01-18 16:50 +0100

csiph-web