Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1312854
| From | Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] proc: revert /proc/<pid>/maps [stack:TID] annotation |
| Date | 2016-01-20 04:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qSRto-xe-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qSIT9-33H-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSMN3-5zF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 20 January 2016 at 03:44, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > Any thoughts on the obvious back-compatibility concerns? ie, why did > Siddhesh implement this in the first place? My bad for not ensuring > that the changelog told us this. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/14/25 has more info: > > : Memory mmaped by glibc for a thread stack currently shows up as a > : simple anonymous map, which makes it difficult to differentiate between > : memory usage of the thread on stack and other dynamic allocation. > : Since glibc already uses MAP_STACK to request this mapping, the > : attached patch uses this flag to add additional VM_STACK_FLAGS to the > : resulting vma so that the mapping is treated as a stack and not any > : regular anonymous mapping. Also, one may use vm_flags to decide if a > : vma is a stack. > > But even that doesn't really tell us what the actual *value* of the > patch is to end-users. The end users needed a way to identify thread stacks programmatically and there wasn't a way to do that. I'm afraid I no longer remember (or have access to the resources that would aid my memory since I changed employers) the details of their requirement. However, I did do this on my own time because I thought it was an interesting project for me and nobody really gave any feedback then as to its utility, so as far as I am concerned you could roll back the main thread maps information since the information is available in the thread-specific files. Siddhesh -- http://siddhesh.in
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] proc: revert /proc/<pid>/maps [stack:TID] annotation Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-01-19 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] proc: revert /proc/<pid>/maps [stack:TID] annotation Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-01-19 23:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] proc: revert /proc/<pid>/maps [stack:TID] annotation Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2016-01-20 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] proc: revert /proc/<pid>/maps [stack:TID] annotation "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2016-01-20 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] proc: revert /proc/<pid>/maps [stack:TID] annotation Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 04:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] proc: revert /proc/<pid>/maps [stack:TID] annotation Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 04:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] proc: revert /proc/<pid>/maps [stack:TID] annotation Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-01-20 06:30 +0100
[PATCH] proc: add missing 'mm' variable in nommu is_stack() Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-01-21 12:00 +0100
csiph-web