Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1312385

Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Consolidate nohz CPU load update code

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 02:18:40PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:01:29PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
> > +static void __update_cpu_load_nohz(struct rq *this_rq,
> > +				   unsigned long curr_jiffies,
> 
> Do we need to pass current jiffies as a function parameter?

I guess we don't, I just wasn't much sure of the possible overhead of READ_ONCE()

> 
> > +				   unsigned long load,
> > +				   int active)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long pending_updates;
> > +
> > +	pending_updates = curr_jiffies - this_rq->last_load_update_tick;
> > +	if (pending_updates) {
> > +		this_rq->last_load_update_tick = curr_jiffies;
> > +		/*
> > +		 * In the regular NOHZ case, we were idle, this means load 0.
> > +		 * In the NOHZ_FULL case, we were non-idle, we should consider
> > +		 * its weighted load.
> > +		 */
> > +		__update_cpu_load(this_rq, load, pending_updates, active);
> > +	}
> > +}

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Consolidate nohz CPU load update code Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 17:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Consolidate nohz CPU load update code Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-01-20 02:50 +0100

csiph-web