Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1312263

Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpuidle optimizations (on top of linux-next)

From "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpuidle optimizations (on top of linux-next)
Date 2016-01-19 15:00 +0100
Message-ID <qSEZc-bz-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qRmrE-4Gw-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSEmw-8o1-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSEwa-8rZ-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 02:28:58 PM Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > * Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 15/01/16 23:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >> >Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> >When I was looking at the cpuidle code after the Sudeeps's problem report,
> > >> >it occured to me that we had some pointless overhead there, so two
> > >> >changes to reduce it follow.
> > >> >
> > >> >[1/2] Make the fallback to to default_idle_call() in call_cpuidle()
> > >> >       unnecessary and drop it.
> > >> >[2/2] Make menu_select() avoid checking states that don't need to
> > >> >       (or even shouldn't) be checked when making the selection.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > >
> > > Rafael, can I pick these up into the scheduler tree?
> > 
> > They won't apply at this point as one commit they depend on is in my
> > linux-next branch waiting for the next push.
> > 
> > Would it be a problem if they went in through the PM tree instead?
> 
> Absolutely no problem:
> 
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

OK, thanks!

Rafael

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/2] cpuidle optimizations (on top of linux-next) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-16 01:00 +0100
  [PATCH 2/2] cpuidle: menu: Avoid pointless checks in menu_select() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-16 01:00 +0100
    [Resend][PATCH 2/2] cpuidle: menu: Avoid pointless checks in menu_select() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-19 00:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpuidle optimizations (on top of linux-next) Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-01-18 14:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpuidle optimizations (on top of linux-next) Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-01-19 08:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpuidle optimizations (on top of linux-next) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-01-19 14:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpuidle optimizations (on top of linux-next) Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-01-19 14:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpuidle optimizations (on top of linux-next) "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-19 15:00 +0100

csiph-web