Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1311134

Re: [PATCH 07/13] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction

From Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 07/13] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction
Date 2016-01-17 12:10 +0100
Message-ID <qRTnz-1FJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <qDb34-14n-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qRd50-6Sf-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qRROO-zs-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qRTnz-1FJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qRTnz-1FJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote:
>
>>> If we have not drained the CQ (consumed budget or more) the second
>>> condition (ib_req_notify_cq) will not be invoked. We are only rearming
>>> the CQ when we drained it completely. So I don't see how we can end up
>>> with missed notifications.
>>
>> We drain the CQ completely for whatever CQEs available at that time,
>> say for example,
>> 33 CQEs drained at time t1. So now req_notify_cq will be invoked at time
>> t2.
>> During time delta t2-t1, CQ in hardware remains unarmed.
>> If cqes are added during that time delta, Will event/interrupt raised
>> for it, for CQ in unarmed state?
>>
>> At time time t2, CQ is armed containing pending CQEs. Will
>> event/interrupt raised for those pending CQEs on next arming?
>
>
> If the device did not reported missed-events then it is the device
> responsibility to generate a new completion event after arming.
>
> Specifically, the mlx4/mlx5 HW is able to generate a completion event
> in your described scenario. A device that is not capable of doing so
> must report missed events to inform the core it has more completions
> to consume.
o.k. Thanks.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 07/13] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 15:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 07/13] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il> - 2016-01-17 10:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 07/13] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 12:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 07/13] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 12:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 07/13] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il> - 2016-01-17 12:10 +0100

csiph-web