Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1311134
| From | Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 07/13] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction |
| Date | 2016-01-17 12:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qRTnz-1FJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qDb34-14n-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qRd50-6Sf-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qRROO-zs-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qRTnz-1FJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qRTnz-1FJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote: > >>> If we have not drained the CQ (consumed budget or more) the second >>> condition (ib_req_notify_cq) will not be invoked. We are only rearming >>> the CQ when we drained it completely. So I don't see how we can end up >>> with missed notifications. >> >> We drain the CQ completely for whatever CQEs available at that time, >> say for example, >> 33 CQEs drained at time t1. So now req_notify_cq will be invoked at time >> t2. >> During time delta t2-t1, CQ in hardware remains unarmed. >> If cqes are added during that time delta, Will event/interrupt raised >> for it, for CQ in unarmed state? >> >> At time time t2, CQ is armed containing pending CQEs. Will >> event/interrupt raised for those pending CQEs on next arming? > > > If the device did not reported missed-events then it is the device > responsibility to generate a new completion event after arming. > > Specifically, the mlx4/mlx5 HW is able to generate a completion event > in your described scenario. A device that is not capable of doing so > must report missed events to inform the core it has more completions > to consume. o.k. Thanks.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 07/13] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 07/13] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il> - 2016-01-17 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 07/13] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 07/13] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 07/13] IB: add a proper completion queue abstraction Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il> - 2016-01-17 12:10 +0100
csiph-web