Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1309799

Re: [lkp] [SUNRPC] e1e5693191: +71.4% fsmark.files_per_sec

From "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [lkp] [SUNRPC] e1e5693191: +71.4% fsmark.files_per_sec
Date 2016-01-15 02:40 +0100
Message-ID <qR1wR-7l7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qQGsp-Pk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQGC5-Z0-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:05 PM, kernel test robot
> <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree
>> revert-e1e56931915cc3fafb4e17d4e1073e24c0a304ce-e1e56931915cc3fafb4e17d4e1073e24c0a304ce
>> commit e1e56931915cc3fafb4e17d4e1073e24c0a304ce ("SUNRPC: Fixup socket wait for memory")
>>
>
> Sure, this fixes the regression noticed in your other mail
> (ceb5d58b21: -69.2% fsmark.files_per_sec_)

Great!

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[lkp] [SUNRPC] e1e5693191: +71.4% fsmark.files_per_sec kernel test robot <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-14 04:10 +0100
  Re: [lkp] [SUNRPC] e1e5693191: +71.4% fsmark.files_per_sec Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> - 2016-01-14 04:20 +0100
    Re: [lkp] [SUNRPC] e1e5693191: +71.4% fsmark.files_per_sec "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-15 02:40 +0100

csiph-web