Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1308716
| From | Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring |
| Date | 2016-01-13 19:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qQyuR-3Ce-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <qPshP-7jN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qPW6e-2l7-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQaCe-3TN-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQwCL-2o0-49@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQybv-3tX-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 16-01-13 18:19:10, David Howells wrote: > Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > I beg to differ. The IMA model is not broken with the current patches > > being upstreamed. The basic concepts developed will continue to be > > used, perhaps not directly by IMA. > > I still object to the change to x509_key_preparse() and still want it > reverting or removing. It affects module signing too. The only problem i see with the code is that in case .ima_mok is not configured x509_validate_trust() returns NULL, which falsely set the key as trusted. This could easily be fixed. Some users do want to be able to load kernel modules signed by other trusted parties. Think of .ima_mok as system wide keyring in this case. It is semantically broken, but it does the right thing. Petko
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-06 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2016-01-07 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-07 01:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-07 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-07 04:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-07 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2016-01-10 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-10 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-10 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-10 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-11 01:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-12 01:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-12 03:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-12 04:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-12 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-12 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-12 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-12 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-12 17:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-12 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> - 2016-01-12 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> - 2016-01-10 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-12 02:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> - 2016-01-12 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-12 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> - 2016-01-13 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-13 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> - 2016-01-13 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-01-13 19:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> - 2016-01-13 19:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-13 20:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] X.509: Partially revert patch to add validation against IMA MOK keyring Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> - 2016-01-13 20:20 +0100
csiph-web