Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1308568
| From | Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls |
| Date | 2016-01-13 17:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qQwt5-2jv-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qQigq-HG-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQigq-HG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQqe0-6f4-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | OTC |
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:47:26 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > So here you actually use that new (misnomed) function, but for > > > +static void power_limit_irq_save_cpu(void *info) > > and > > > +static void power_limit_irq_restore_cpu(void *info) > > you use a bog standard smp function call. What's the benefit of > adding that rmw function over a bog standard smp function call if you > can only use it for one instance of the same pattern? > > Boris asked you the same question here > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151220152749.GA29805@pd.tnic > > but you decided to ignore it. +Borislav, Thanks for bring this out. I didn't mean to ignore. I thought my point was stated in the commit message there was no point of going back and forth. Read-Modify-Write is quite common, not just for RAPL could be used by future code. Sorry if I wasn't clear. Jacob
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-13 02:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-01-13 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-13 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-01-13 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-13 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-01-13 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-13 19:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-01-13 20:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-13 21:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-01-13 22:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-13 23:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-01-13 23:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-13 23:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-01-13 23:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-01-13 23:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-13 23:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-13 23:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-01-13 23:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-01-13 23:00 +0100
csiph-web