Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1308298
| From | Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified |
| Date | 2016-01-13 12:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qQrD4-7jL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <qPOV5-5Iz-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qPQ0O-6AV-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQ3AK-7rn-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQ87o-28L-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQd74-5xe-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Peter, On 01/12/2016 08:47 PM, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 01/12/2016 06:22 AM, Sebastian Frias wrote: >> >> For the record, I'm using a SoC emulator, and thus do not have a bootloader per se and there are a bunch of other things that I cannot count on. >> The emulator has the UART pre-setup, so I just need Linux to take over without changing the parameters. >> Ideally, I would like to have the same image of Linux+DT to start in any instance of the emulator or real chips, regardless of the clock ratios, that's why I sort of need Linux to not change the UART speed, which is quite tricky because there are no clock generators in the emulator. > > Got it, thanks for the info. > Please test the series I just cc'd you on plus the patch I sent > you yesterday. > > That should get you an earlycon up and running on that simulator; > let me know if it doesn't and we'll go from there. Ok, thanks. I will try as soon as we finish rebasing our changes on top of "mainline" (or HEAD, or is it "-next"? I don't know how you guys call the most recent code base for Linux) Actually, I tried yesterday on a 4.1.13 but "[drivers/tty/serial/earlycon.c:62] earlycon_map()" was still the last message I got, just as with the OF_EARLYCON_DECLARE hack I had previously talk about, and so I would like to test on the same conditions than you, mainline. > >> NOTE: on my tree I'm using the patch I previously submitted here, so Linux is probing the UART so it works for all my cases, but I would like to go back to a standard tree. > > I expect that patch to go into -next sometime during the 4.5-rc cycle. Sounds good! Thanks, Sebastian > > > Regards, > Peter Hurley > >>> Note: calling the UART driver "Au1x00/RT288x" is a bit of a misnomer, >>> as these are names of SoCs using that distinct register layout. >>> The actual IP is probably the 16550-compatible Palmchip BK-3103. >>> https://sites.google.com/a/palmchiptech.com/palmchiptech/product-services/hardware-services/ip-cores/bk-3103 >>> (Not sure that this website is legitimate, though.) >>> >>> When I need earlyprintk support, I use this patch from Mans: >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2081016 >>> >>> Regards. >>> >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net> - 2016-01-11 16:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2016-01-11 17:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net> - 2016-01-11 19:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2016-01-11 20:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2016-01-11 21:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2016-01-11 21:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2016-01-12 10:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net> - 2016-01-12 15:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2016-01-12 20:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2016-01-12 23:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2016-01-12 23:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net> - 2016-01-13 12:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2016-01-13 17:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net> - 2016-01-12 15:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH] always probe UART HW when options are not specified Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2016-01-12 22:20 +0100
csiph-web