Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

From	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Date	2016-01-12 21:30 +0100
Message-ID	<qQdJL-62d-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qPWIW-2PA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQ3r4-7nB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQ5Me-nk-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:58:11 +1100

> Hi Ido,
> 
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:11:02 +0200 Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> wrote:
>>
>> The lock can be moved further down, just before mlxsw_reg_sfd_pack.
>> Other than that everything looks fine. Thank you!
> 
> Thanks, I wasn't sure but I will do that tomorrow (unless Dave beats me to it).

I did the merge but did not move the locking.  Feel free to send me
a patch to do so.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-01-12 03:20 +0100
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> - 2016-01-12 10:30 +0100
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-01-12 13:00 +0100
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-01-12 21:30 +0100

csiph-web