Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1308781

[PATCH v3 0/4] x86: faster mb()+documentation tweaks

From "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH v3 0/4] x86: faster mb()+documentation tweaks
Date 2016-01-13 21:20 +0100
Message-ID <qQA3D-4La-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


mb() typically uses mfence on modern x86, but a micro-benchmark shows that it's
2 to 3 times slower than lock; addl that we use on older CPUs.

So let's use the locked variant everywhere.

While I was at it, I found some inconsistencies in comments in
arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h

The documentation fixes are included first - I verified that
they do not change the generated code at all. They should be
safe to apply directly.

The last patch changes mb() to lock addl. I was unable to
measure a speed difference on a macro benchmark,
but I noted that even doing
	#define mb() barrier()
seems to make no difference for most benchmarks
(it causes hangs sometimes, of course).

HPA asked that the last patch is deferred until we hear back from
intel, which makes sense of course. So it needs HPA's ack.

I hope I'm not splitting this up too much - the reason is I wanted to isolate
the code changes (that people might want to test for performance)
from comment changes approved by Linus, from (so far unreviewed) changes
I came up with myself.

Changes from v2:
	add patch adding cc clobber for addl
	tweak commit log for patch 2
	use addl at SP-4 (as opposed to SP) to reduce data dependencies

Michael S. Tsirkin (4):
  x86: add cc clobber for addl
  x86: drop a comment left over from X86_OOSTORE
  x86: tweak the comment about use of wmb for IO
  x86: drop mfence in favor of lock+addl

 arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h | 20 +++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

-- 
MST

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v3 0/4] x86: faster mb()+documentation tweaks "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-01-13 21:20 +0100
  [PATCH v3 4/4] x86: drop mfence in favor of lock+addl "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-01-13 21:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] x86: faster mb()+documentation tweaks Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-01-14 12:40 +0100

csiph-web