Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1307151
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks |
| Date | 2016-01-12 10:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qQ3AJ-7rn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qPOBH-5zs-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qPOLn-5E8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qPSP1-7w-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11-01-16, 23:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:35:45PM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote: > > +/** > > + * Iterate over governors > > + * > > + * cpufreq_governor_list is protected by cpufreq_governor_mutex. > > + */ > > +static LIST_HEAD(cpufreq_governor_list); > > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_mutex); > > +#define for_each_governor(__governor) \ > > + list_for_each_entry(__governor, &cpufreq_governor_list, governor_list) > > So you could stuff the lockdep_assert_held() you later add intididually > into the for_each_governor macro, impossible to forget that way. How exactly? I couldn't see how it can be done in a neat and clean way. -- viresh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-01-11 18:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-11 23:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-12 00:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-12 09:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-01-12 11:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-12 17:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-11 23:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-01-12 10:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-01-12 12:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-12 13:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-01-12 13:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-01-12 16:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: bring data structures close to their locks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-12 17:00 +0100
csiph-web