Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1303641
| From | Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFD] Functional dependencies between devices |
| Date | 2016-01-07 16:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qOkcH-137-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qodTc-6r2-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qpqOm-3fL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 30 October 2015 at 23:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 04:24:14PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> My idea is to represent a supplier-consumer dependency between devices (or
>> more precisely between device+driver combos) as a "link" object containing
>> pointers to the devices in question, a list node for each of them and some
>> additional information related to the management of those objects, ie.
>> something like:
>>
>> struct device_link {
>> struct device *supplier;
>> struct list_head supplier_node;
>> struct device *consumer;
>> struct list_head consumer_node;
>> <flags, status etc>
>> };
>>
>> In general, there will be two lists of those things per device, one list
>> of links to consumers and one list of links to suppliers.
>>
>> In that picture, links will be created by calling, say:
>>
>> int device_add_link(struct device *me, struct device *my_supplier, unsigned int flags);
>
> At first glance, I like this, nice. Now to see how well it can be
> implemented :)
Hi Greg,
what's your opinion on using this to order device probes so we don't
try to probe a device that we know it has unfulfilled dependencies?
Regards,
Tomeu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFD] Functional dependencies between devices Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> - 2016-01-07 16:00 +0100
Re: [RFD] Functional dependencies between devices Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-01-07 22:30 +0100
Re: [RFD] Functional dependencies between devices Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> - 2016-01-08 08:30 +0100
Re: [RFD] Functional dependencies between devices Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-01-08 16:20 +0100
csiph-web