Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1303569
| From | Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout |
| Date | 2016-01-07 14:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qOiky-8ew-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qOfd0-6ef-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 10:33 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Recent changes to 'struct flow_keys' (e.g commit d34af823ff40 ("net: Add
> VLAN ID to flow_keys")) introduced a performance regression in netvsc
> driver. Is problem is, however, not the above mentioned commit but the
> fact that netvsc_set_hash() function did some assumptions on the struct
> flow_keys data layout and this is wrong. We need to extract the data we
> need (src/dst addresses and ports) after the dissect.
>
> The issue could also be solved in a completely different way: as suggested
> by Eric instead of our own homegrown netvsc_set_hash() we could use
> skb_get_hash() which does more or less the same. Unfortunately, the
> testing done by Simon showed that Hyper-V hosts are not happy with our
> Jenkins hash, selecting the output queue with the current algorithm based
> on Toeplitz hash works significantly better.
Were tests done on IPv6 traffic ?
Toeplitz hash takes at least 100 ns to hash 12 bytes (one iteration per
bit : 96 iterations)
For IPv6 it is 3 times this, since we have to hash 36 bytes.
I do not see how it can compete with skb_get_hash() that directly gives
skb->hash for local TCP flows.
See commits b73c3d0e4f0e1961e15bec18720e48aabebe2109
("net: Save TX flow hash in sock and set in skbuf on xmit")
and 877d1f6291f8e391237e324be58479a3e3a7407c
("net: Set sk_txhash from a random number")
I understand Microsoft loves Toeplitz, but this looks not well placed
here.
I suspect there is another problem.
Please share your numbers and test methodology, and the alternative
patch Simon tested so that we can double check it.
Thanks.
PS: For the time being this patch can probably be applied on -net tree,
as it fixes a real bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> - 2016-01-07 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> - 2016-01-07 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 02:10 +0100
RE: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com> - 2016-01-08 04:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 07:20 +0100
RE: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com> - 2016-01-08 19:10 +0100
RE: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> - 2016-01-08 22:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> - 2016-01-09 01:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-01-10 23:30 +0100
RE: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> - 2016-01-14 00:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-01-14 06:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> - 2016-01-14 18:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-01-14 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 19:30 +0100
RE: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> - 2016-01-14 19:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> - 2016-01-14 19:50 +0100
RE: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> - 2016-01-14 20:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> - 2016-01-14 20:50 +0100
RE: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> - 2016-01-14 21:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> - 2016-01-14 22:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-01-14 23:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 23:10 +0100
RE: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> - 2016-01-14 23:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct flow_keys layout Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 19:00 +0100
csiph-web