Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1305110

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH

From Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH
Date 2016-01-09 01:50 +0100
Message-ID <qOPTb-68W-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qOrnQ-63O-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qOzbH-2Yr-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:55:32PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> wrote:
> > This patchset adds BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH map type which allows
> > percpu value.
>
> I am also thinking about using percpu variable to ebpf map, but IMO it
> should be better for ARRAY map instead of HASH map, then we can
> avoid the atomic op in eBPF program, see example of tracex3, sockex1
> and sockex3 in sample/bpf/ of kernel tree.  Also looks the ARRAY map
> usage in bcc is wrong, strictly speaking.
array and hash are two different use cases. May be we should have percpu
value for array map too.

>
> For HASH map, it is easy to make cpu id as part of key, then the map
> can be thought as percpu too, and atomic op isn't needed in eBPF program.
Putting the cpu id as part of the key was indeed the first hack I did
to get a sense of potential benefit.

However, by extending the real-key with cpu-id, it is not intuitive to
use and it is prone to error.  For example, how to delete a real-key for
all cpus?  Iterating a particular real-key for all cpu is also tricky.  What
does it mean if a real-key exists for cpu#0 but not cpu#1? The real-key
got deleted from all cpu while iterating? or something else?  I believe
there are ways to get around but it is better to provide a clean
implementation instead.

> Given it is always related with performance, could you provide some data
> about the improvement? Also you can compare this patchset with the
> approach of providing cpu id as hash key.
In my test (bpf+kprobe at tcp_rcv_established()), both this patchset and
extend(real_key, cpu_id) approach save ~3% CPU while receiving ~4Mpps
in a 40cores machine.  The bpf is mostly bumping some counters for
each received packet.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH net-next 0/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> - 2016-01-07 23:40 +0100
  [PATCH net-next 3/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add syscall to iterate percpu value of a key Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> - 2016-01-07 23:40 +0100
  [PATCH net-next 2/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> - 2016-01-07 23:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 11:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> - 2016-01-12 04:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> - 2016-01-12 08:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 11:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-01-08 08:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> - 2016-01-09 01:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 10:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> - 2016-01-10 03:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 03:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> - 2016-01-11 23:40 +0100
              Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 06:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] bpf: bpf_htab: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 07:10 +0100

csiph-web