Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1304941

Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: Update the cpu freqs table

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Xing,

Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016, 19:31:38 schrieb Xing Zheng:
> Actually, we need more cpu freqs which are 50MHz integer multiples.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> 
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3036.dtsi |   13 ++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3036.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3036.dtsi
> index 1cb5877..1a773eb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3036.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3036.dtsi
> @@ -79,7 +79,18 @@
>  			resets = <&cru SRST_CORE0>;
>  			operating-points = <
>  				/* KHz    uV */
> -				 816000 1000000
> +				1200000 1200000
> +				1100000 1200000
> +				1000000 1200000
> +				 900000 1200000
> +				 800000 1200000
> +				 700000 1200000
> +				 600000 1200000
> +				 500000 1200000
> +				 400000 1200000
> +				 300000 1200000
> +				 200000 1200000
> +				 100000 1200000

what about reducing the voltage as well?

From rk3288-specific discussions I remember that reducing the frequency 
without touching the voltage, didn't really save so much energy.
And it looks like it was running 816MHz@1.0V just fine as well.

I guess you should find out which voltages are really necessary for each 
step.


Heiko

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[RESEND RFC PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: Update the cpu freqs table Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> - 2016-01-08 12:40 +0100
  Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: Update the cpu freqs table Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-01-08 20:20 +0100
    Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: Update the cpu freqs  table Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> - 2016-01-09 04:10 +0100

csiph-web