Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1304735
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: Don't group_idle if cfqq has big thinktime |
| Date | 2016-01-08 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qOIyn-YW-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qOkFI-1wu-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qOkFJ-1wu-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello, Jan. On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:28:12PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > @@ -2947,8 +2948,13 @@ static void cfq_arm_slice_timer(struct cfq_data *cfqd) > return; > } > > - /* There are other queues in the group, don't do group idle */ > - if (group_idle && cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq > 1) > + /* > + * There are other queues in the group or this is the only group and > + * it has too big thinktime, don't do group idle. > + */ > + if (group_idle && > + (cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq > 1 || > + !cfq_io_thinktime_big(cfqd, &st->ttime, true))) > return; Is the negation in front of the cfq_io_thinktime_big() right? That doesn't seem to match the comment or description. What am I missing? Thanks. -- tejun
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: Don't group_idle if cfqq has big thinktime Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-01-07 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: Don't group_idle if cfqq has big thinktime Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-01-08 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: Don't group_idle if cfqq has big thinktime Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-01-11 16:50 +0100
csiph-web