Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1304735

Re: [PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: Don't group_idle if cfqq has big thinktime

From Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: Don't group_idle if cfqq has big thinktime
Date 2016-01-08 18:00 +0100
Message-ID <qOIyn-YW-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qOkFI-1wu-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qOkFJ-1wu-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hello, Jan.

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:28:12PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> @@ -2947,8 +2948,13 @@ static void cfq_arm_slice_timer(struct cfq_data *cfqd)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* There are other queues in the group, don't do group idle */
> -	if (group_idle && cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq > 1)
> +	/*
> +	 * There are other queues in the group or this is the only group and
> +	 * it has too big thinktime, don't do group idle.
> +	 */
> +	if (group_idle &&
> +	    (cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq > 1 ||
> +	     !cfq_io_thinktime_big(cfqd, &st->ttime, true)))
>  		return;

Is the negation in front of the cfq_io_thinktime_big() right?  That
doesn't seem to match the comment or description.  What am I missing?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: Don't group_idle if cfqq has big thinktime Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-01-07 16:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: Don't group_idle if cfqq has big  thinktime Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-01-08 18:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: Don't group_idle if cfqq has big  thinktime Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-01-11 16:50 +0100

csiph-web