Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1303254

Re: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 009/211] xhci: don't finish a TD if we get a short transfer event mid TD

From Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 009/211] xhci: don't finish a TD if we get a short transfer event mid TD
Date 2016-01-07 04:00 +0100
Message-ID <qO8XU-1Eh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qNFMd-7nV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNFMe-7nV-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNZKX-43H-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qO2pt-5zb-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 11:55 -0800, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 17:05 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 11:41 -0800, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> > > 4.2.8-ckt1 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > > 
> > > ------------------
> > > 
> > > From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > commit e210c422b6fdd2dc123bedc588f399aefd8bf9de upstream.
> > > 
> > > If the difference is big enough between the bytes asked and received
> > > in a bulk transfer we can get a short transfer event pointing to a TRB in
> > > the middle of the TD. We don't want to handle the TD yet as we will anyway
> > > receive a new event for the last TRB in the TD.
> > > 
> > > Hold off from finishing the TD and removing it from the list until we
> > > receive an event for the last TRB in the TD
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > [ kamal: backport to 4.2-stable: context ]
> > > Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
> > [...]
> > 
> > This causes regressions (see https://bugs.debian.org/808602 and
> > https://bugs.debian.org/808953 ) so please hold off until there's a
> > complete fix upstream.
> 
> Thanks for the heads-up, Ben.  I'll defer it for 4.2-stable.
> 
> I'm thinking that it should also be reverted from the stable kernels
> that already carry it (3.2, 3.13, 3.16, 3.19), unless that complete
> upstream fix is really imminent.  Is it?

Normally if there's a regression that affects both mainline and stable
branches, we wait for it to be fixed in mainline first.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Life would be so much easier if we could look at the source code.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 009/211] xhci: don't finish a TD if we get a short transfer event mid TD Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> - 2016-01-05 20:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 009/211] xhci: don't finish a TD if we get a  short transfer event mid TD Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-06 18:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 009/211] xhci: don't finish a TD if we get a  short transfer event mid TD Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> - 2016-01-06 21:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 009/211] xhci: don't finish a TD if we get a  short transfer event mid TD Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-07 04:00 +0100

csiph-web