Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables

From	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables
Date	2016-01-04 19:50 +0100
Message-ID	<qNimC-7d3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qMTod-7DP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qMToe-7DP-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNeCl-4IB-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNhTA-73f-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNi3g-76n-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 01/04/2016 10:20 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> May I humbly ask why the [Finnish] you don't use the equivalent of the
>> x86 _ASM_EXTABLE() macro?  In fact, why don't we make that one generic, too?
> 
> I'm messing with that right now (with help from Andy Lutomirski and Boris) to
> add different classes of exception table (so I can tag some instructions as being
> suitable for fixup from the machine check handler).  So it might not be generic
> for much longer.
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145187079504846&w=2
> 

That doesn't mean it can't be overridden.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

[PATCH 0/6] generic relative extable support Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-01-03 17:10 +0100
  [PATCH 1/6] extable: add support for relative extables to search and sort routines Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-01-03 17:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/6] extable: add support for relative extables to search  and sort routines Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> - 2016-01-04 22:10 +0100
  [PATCH 5/6] ia64/extable: use generic search and sort routines Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-01-03 17:10 +0100
  [PATCH 4/6] x86/extable: use generic search and sort routines Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-01-03 17:10 +0100
  [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-01-03 17:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-01-04 15:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-01-04 19:20 +0100
        RE: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2016-01-04 19:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-01-04 19:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-01-04 20:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2016-01-04 20:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-01-04 20:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 0/6] generic relative extable support Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-01-04 12:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/6] generic relative extable support "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-01-04 19:20 +0100

csiph-web