Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1300741
| From | Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Y2038] [PATCH v2 2/2] ppdev: add support for compat ioctl |
| Date | 2016-01-04 14:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qNddg-3WR-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qGDvP-62G-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qMgdc-8eR-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qMo13-4Eu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qMD9M-5yh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 11:40:51PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 02 January 2016 11:59:29 Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > Just to be sure we are talking about the same thing: you mean running a 64-bit > > > kernel in a kvm guest with a 32-bit file system, right? Running a 32-bit > > > kvm guest on a 64-bit host would not be interesting of course. > > > > The kvm (actually qemu, started from virt-manager with -enable-kvm) that > > I just configured shows the following: > > > > lscpu shows: > > > > Architecture: i686 > > CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit > > Byte Order: Little Endian > > CPU(s): 1 > > On-line CPU(s) list: 0 > > Thread(s) per core: 1 > > Core(s) per socket: 1 > > Socket(s): 1 > > Vendor ID: GenuineIntel > > CPU family: 6 > > Model: 6 > > Stepping: 3 > > CPU MHz: 2993.200 > > BogoMIPS: 5986.40 > > Virtualization: VT-x > > Hypervisor vendor: KVM > > Virtualization type: full > > L1d cache: 32K > > L1i cache: 32K > > L2 cache: 4096K > > > > uname -i shows: > > i686 > > > > > > Will it be ok to test in this one? > > > If 'uname -i' reports i686, that usually means you have configured the > kernel for 32-bit. Try rebuilding the kernel with 'CONFIG_64BIT' and > 'CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION' enabled to test that the 32-bit user space now > also works under a 64-bit kernel. done... tested with CONFIG_64BIT and CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION. The original ppdev code failed with my userspace test code. After applying patch 1/2 of v3 it still failed, but after applying 2/2 of v3 it worked. will you take v3 through your y2038 tree? or I can keep them for, ummmmm, 4.6 merge window. > > That reminds me, we should now remove the code from fs/compat_ioctl.c > that was handling emulating the other ioctl commands, the new .compat_ioctl > callback in ppdev takes care of that along with the PPGETTIME/PPSETTIME > calls, see below Bamvor, care to send a patch for these also... regards sudip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [Y2038] [PATCH v2 2/2] ppdev: add support for compat ioctl Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 07:40 +0100
Re: [Y2038] [PATCH v2 2/2] ppdev: add support for compat ioctl Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-01-02 23:50 +0100
Re: [Y2038] [PATCH v2 2/2] ppdev: add support for compat ioctl Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 14:20 +0100
Re: [Y2038] [PATCH v2 2/2] ppdev: add support for compat ioctl Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-01-04 14:30 +0100
Re: [Y2038] [PATCH v2 2/2] ppdev: add support for compat ioctl Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org> - 2016-01-06 14:00 +0100
Re: [Y2038] [PATCH v2 2/2] ppdev: add support for compat ioctl Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-01-07 16:20 +0100
csiph-web