Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1300737

Re: [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Fix complex_count vs. simple op race

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 02 Jan 2016, Manfred Spraul wrote:

>Commit 6d07b68ce16a ("ipc/sem.c: optimize sem_lock()") introduced a race:
>
>sem_lock has a fast path that allows parallel simple operations.
>There are two reasons why a simple operation cannot run in parallel:
>- a non-simple operations is ongoing (sma->sem_perm.lock held)
>- a complex operation is sleeping (sma->complex_count != 0)
>
>As both facts are stored independently, a thread can bypass the current
>checks by sleeping in the right positions. See below for more details
>(or kernel bugzilla 105651).
>
>The patch fixes that by creating one variable (complex_mode)
>that tracks both reasons why parallel operations are not possible.
>
>The patch also updates stale documentation regarding the locking.
>
>With regards to stable kernels:
>The patch is required for all kernels that include the commit 6d07b68ce16a
>("ipc/sem.c: optimize sem_lock()") (3.10?)
>
>The alternative is to revert the patch that introduced the race.

I am just now catching up with this, but a quick thought is that we probably
want to keep 6d07b68ce16a as waiting on unlocking all sem->lock should be
much worse for performance than keeping track of the complex 'mode'. Specially
if we have a large array.

Also, any idea what workload exposed this race? Anyway, will take a closer look
at the patch/issue.

Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Fix complex_count vs. simple op race Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> - 2016-01-02 13:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Fix complex_count vs. simple op race Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-01-04 14:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Fix complex_count vs. simple op race Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> - 2016-01-04 19:40 +0100

csiph-web