Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1302835

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update sustainable power

From Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update sustainable power
Date 2016-01-06 16:10 +0100
Message-ID <qNXSO-2Of-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qNS6J-7dw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNTcu-87B-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNUrU-sc-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:21:54AM +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 06/01/16 10:07, Javi Merino wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:53:44PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> >>k_po/k_pu are two proportional term constants and essentially they have
> >>fixed ratio compared with sustainable power. In current implementation,
> >>k_po and k_pu are absolute value after calculation and cannot represent
> >>the ratio relationship with sustainable power; as a result, when change
> >>sustainable power we cannot smoothly change proportional term constant.
> >
> >In v2 Daniel said that the use case was made up.  Can you elaborate on
> >why we need this?
> 
> To be clear, I didn't say Leo's use case was made up. In truth I've
> never asked Leo what his use case is.

Sorry, I didn't mean to say that Leo had made it up.  I was just
asking for a use case and it looked to me that the "fan inhibitor
mode" was something that you guys had talked about.

Cheers,
Javi

> It was simply the use case that I used to illustrate a bug in the v1
> implementation which was made up (and which you asked for more
> details of).
> 
> 
> 
> Daniel.
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update sustainable power Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2016-01-06 10:00 +0100
  [PATCH v3 2/4] thermal: power_allocator: change k_pu_ratio/k_po_ratio as percentage Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2016-01-06 10:00 +0100
  [PATCH v3 4/4] thermal: power_allocator: document k_pu_ratio/k_po_ratio Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2016-01-06 10:00 +0100
  [PATCH v3 1/4] thermal: power_allocator: rework proportional parameter Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2016-01-06 10:00 +0100
  [PATCH v3 3/4] thermal: add sys node for k_pu_ratio/k_po_ratio Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2016-01-06 10:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update  sustainable power Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> - 2016-01-06 11:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update  sustainable power Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> - 2016-01-06 12:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update  sustainable power Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> - 2016-01-06 12:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update  sustainable power Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> - 2016-01-06 16:10 +0100

csiph-web