Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1302728
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning |
| Date | 2016-01-06 13:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qNVxE-16O-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qNPLz-5Qn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNVeh-YK-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNVnZ-12A-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 05:49:22PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Wednesday 06 January 2016 05:48 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:45:22AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >> Enhanced transient response (ETR) will affect the configuration of CKADV. > >>+-maxim,junction-temp-warning: Junction temp warning on which device generates > >>+ warning interrupts. > >This needs to specify what the values are - it looks like it's raw > >register values but I'd have expected from this that it'd be an actual > >temperature. > I tried to roundoff to the next higher threshold when supported value (120 > or 140 degC) is not provided in driver. But it is fine to me to specify the > possible value setting here and DT binding doc. Will do on next patch. I don't really mind which you use so long as the documentation is clear. > >>+-interrupt-flags: Interrupt flags for registering interrupt which can not be > >>+ passed via interrupt properties. > >Why is this being specified and what are the values? Most devices don't > >have this... > I have two different design with this device: > In both design, I have main PMIC like MAX77620 and two MAX77621. > In one of design, interrupt from MAX77620, and alert from both MAX77621 > shorted and going to Arm GIC controller. On this case, I need to register > the interrupt as SHARED interrupt. This property can not be passed via > "interrupt" properties from DT. > That's why this flag is added to support this. If the driver supports shared interrupts it should just register as a shared interrupt all the time, there is nothing about shared interrupts which requires that the pin actually be shared. > Now, by default, if I register the interrupt as SHARED in driver then it > failed on second design as GPIO does not offer to register as SHARED > interrupt. What makes you say that this would fail?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/1] regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-01-06 07:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-01-06 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-01-06 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-01-06 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-01-06 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-01-06 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-01-06 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-01-06 17:30 +0100
csiph-web