Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1302468
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/7] printk: Hand over printing to console if printing too long |
| Date | 2016-01-06 09:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qNRNp-763-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <qLBtn-6LE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qLBWq-7hq-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qLDvb-8ae-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNB5T-480-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNN73-417-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On (01/06/16 12:38), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (01/05/16 15:48), Jan Kara wrote: > > > [..] > > > > cond_resched() does its job there, of course. well, a user process still can > > > > do a lot of call_console_drivers() calls. may be we can check who is calling > > > > console_unlock() and if we have "!printk_sync && !oops_in_progress" (or just printk_sync > > > > test) AND a user process then return from console_unlock() doing irq_work_queue() > > > > and set PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT pending bit, the way vprintk_emit() does it. > > > > > > attached two patches, I ended up having on top of yours. just in case. > > > > > > printk: factor out can_printk_async() > > > > > > console_unlock() can be called directly or indirectly by a user > > > space process, so it can end up doing call_console_drivers() loop, > > > which will hold it from returning back to user-space from a syscall > > > for unpredictable amount of time. > > > > > > Factor out can_printk_async() function, which queues an irq work and > > > sets a PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT pending bit (if we can do async printk). > > > vprintk_emit() already does it, add can_printk_async() call to > > > console_unlock() for !PF_KTHREAD processes. > > > > I'd be cautious about changing this userspace visible behavior. Someone may > > be relying on it... I agree that sometimes we can block userspace process > > in kernel for a long time (e.g. in my testing I often see syslog process > > doing the printing) but so far I didn't see / was notified about some real > > problem with this. So unless I see some real user issues with user > > processes doing printing for too long I would not touch this. > > and w/o a lot of effort (no heavy printk message traffic) or like this on another setup ([k|u]_ts updated to u64) # cat /proc/1/time_in_console_unlock kern:[12.755920] user:[38.367332] -ss -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/7] printk: Hand over printing to console if printing too long Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-01-05 15:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/7] printk: Hand over printing to console if printing too long Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 04:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/7] printk: Hand over printing to console if printing too long Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/7] printk: Hand over printing to console if printing too long Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-01-06 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/7] printk: Hand over printing to console if printing too long Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 12:20 +0100
csiph-web