Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1302267
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] intel-lpss: support non-ACPI platforms |
| Date | 2016-01-06 00:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qNJd8-1kd-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qAypb-5id-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qCSD7-699-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNE3Q-69u-83@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 09:57:35 AM Laura Abbott wrote: > On 12/06/2015 05:44 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, November 30, 2015 05:11:28 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> This series includes few logical sets that bring a support of non-ACPI > >> platforms for Intel Skylake. > >> > >> First part is a refactoring of built-in device properties support: > >> - keep single value inside the structure > >> - provide helper macros to define built-in properties > >> - fall back to secondary fwnode if primary has no asked property > >> > >> Second is a propagating built-in device properties in platform core. > >> > >> Third one is modifications to MFD code and intel-lpss.c driver in particular > >> to define and pass built-in properties to the individual drivers. > >> > >> And last part is a fix for I2C bug found on Lenovo Yoga hardware and a first > >> converted user. > >> > >> Built-in device properties is an alternative to platform data. It provides a > >> unified API that drivers can use to cover all cases at once: DT, ACPI, and > >> built-in properties. > >> > >> With this series applied a platform data can be considered obsolete. Moreover, > >> built-in device properties allow to adjust the existing configuration, for > >> example, in cases when ACPI values are wrong on some platforms. > >> > >> The series has been tested on available hardware and doesn't break current > >> behaviour. But we ask people who have the affected hardware to apply the series > >> on your side and check with Lenovo hardware. > >> > >> Changelog v2: > >> - fix isuues found by kbuild bot (kbuild) > >> - append a patch to propagate device properties in polatform code (Arnd) > >> - update few existing and add couple of new patches due to above > >> - check with kmemleak > >> > >> Andy Shevchenko (9): > >> device property: always check for fwnode type > >> device property: rename helper functions > >> device property: refactor built-in properties support > >> device property: keep single value inplace > >> device property: improve readability of macros > >> device property: return -EINVAL when property isn't found in ACPI > >> device property: Fallback to secondary fwnode if primary misses the > >> property > >> mfd: core: propagate device properties to sub devices drivers > >> mfd: intel-lpss: Pass HSUART configuration via properties > >> > >> Heikki Krogerus (1): > >> device property: helper macros for property entry creation > >> > >> Mika Westerberg (6): > >> device property: Take a copy of the property set > >> driver core: platform: Add support for built-in device properties > >> driver core: Do not overwrite secondary fwnode with NULL if it is set > >> mfd: intel-lpss: Add support for passing device properties > >> mfd: intel-lpss: Pass SDA hold time to I2C host controller driver > >> i2c: designware: Convert to use unified device property API > > > > I'm going to queue up this series for v4.5. > > > > If there are any problems with it or objections from anyone, please let me know. > > > > > Raising an old thread, I pulled this series into Fedora rawhide and > while it worked for Lenovo Yoga we received a report that it caused > a regression on the Dell Inspiron 7559 (see > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275718#c27) . I haven't > asked the reporter about bisecting to see which patch broke it. > Were there any known follow up patches? There were a few. All of them are in my linux-next branch if you can try this one. Alternatively, I can expose a branch with these to you to test. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] intel-lpss: support non-ACPI platforms Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2016-01-05 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] intel-lpss: support non-ACPI platforms "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-06 00:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] intel-lpss: support non-ACPI platforms Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2016-01-06 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] intel-lpss: support non-ACPI platforms Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-07 09:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] intel-lpss: support non-ACPI platforms "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-08 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] intel-lpss: support non-ACPI platforms Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] intel-lpss: support non-ACPI platforms Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> - 2016-01-08 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] intel-lpss: support non-ACPI platforms Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2016-01-11 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] intel-lpss: support non-ACPI platforms Benjamin Tissoires <btissoir@redhat.com> - 2016-01-11 17:50 +0100
csiph-web