Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1302257

Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next

From Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next
Date 2016-01-06 00:00 +0100
Message-ID <qNIK6-Sd-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qK4pQ-685-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNG5D-7Ky-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNGoX-7Sr-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNHl0-5x-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNIqJ-Jy-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 01/05/2016 03:32 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 22:26:33 +0100 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday 05 January 2016 13:22:49 Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> branches:
>>>>>> drm-vc4-next
>>>>>> bcm2835-dt-next
>>>>>> bcm2835-soc-next
>>>>>> bcm2835-drivers-next
>>>>>> bcm2385-defconfig-next
>>>>>> (bcm2835-maintainers-next is a placeholder since we have nothing for it
>>>>>> this round)
>>>
>>> Typically maintainers merge everything together into a single "for-next"
>>> to maintain a reasonable set of branches. I guess it doesn't affect me
>>> so my opinion isn't too relevant though:-)
>>
>> In my experience the common for-next branch works best because
>> you can change the set of branches that get merged into it as
>> needed. If there are 6 branches today, it's quite likely that there
>> will be another one in the future and if only one branch gets
>> merged into for-next, you don't need to worry about updating the list.
>
> Certainly, that would be easier for me.  Though you may want to keep
> the drm-vc4-next branch separate since that get merged via a different
> tree (and can appear at a different point in my merge list).
>
> It does mean an extra step for you i.e. you would need to merge all the
> relevant branches into the single "for-next" branch, but that should
> not be too big an imposition.

FWIW, I almost always build/test the for-next branch rather than (or 
sometimes in addition to) the individual branches, and since I do so 
much with that branch, I use some scripts to automate generating it, and 
pushing all the branches to kernel.org. The Tegra version of those 
scripts is at:

> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tegra/maint-scripts.git/tree/

In particular, see merge-linux-tegra.sh and its configuration file 
tegra-branches.sh.dot. Also push-linux-tegra.sh does all the pushes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-01-04 08:30 +0100
  Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2016-01-05 21:10 +0100
    Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 21:20 +0100
    Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> - 2016-01-05 21:30 +0100
      Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-01-05 22:30 +0100
        Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-01-05 23:40 +0100
          Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> - 2016-01-06 00:00 +0100

csiph-web