Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1302257
| From | Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next |
| Date | 2016-01-06 00:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qNIK6-Sd-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qK4pQ-685-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNG5D-7Ky-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNGoX-7Sr-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNHl0-5x-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNIqJ-Jy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 01/05/2016 03:32 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 22:26:33 +0100 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 05 January 2016 13:22:49 Stephen Warren wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> branches: >>>>>> drm-vc4-next >>>>>> bcm2835-dt-next >>>>>> bcm2835-soc-next >>>>>> bcm2835-drivers-next >>>>>> bcm2385-defconfig-next >>>>>> (bcm2835-maintainers-next is a placeholder since we have nothing for it >>>>>> this round) >>> >>> Typically maintainers merge everything together into a single "for-next" >>> to maintain a reasonable set of branches. I guess it doesn't affect me >>> so my opinion isn't too relevant though:-) >> >> In my experience the common for-next branch works best because >> you can change the set of branches that get merged into it as >> needed. If there are 6 branches today, it's quite likely that there >> will be another one in the future and if only one branch gets >> merged into for-next, you don't need to worry about updating the list. > > Certainly, that would be easier for me. Though you may want to keep > the drm-vc4-next branch separate since that get merged via a different > tree (and can appear at a different point in my merge list). > > It does mean an extra step for you i.e. you would need to merge all the > relevant branches into the single "for-next" branch, but that should > not be too big an imposition. FWIW, I almost always build/test the for-next branch rather than (or sometimes in addition to) the individual branches, and since I do so much with that branch, I use some scripts to automate generating it, and pushing all the branches to kernel.org. The Tegra version of those scripts is at: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tegra/maint-scripts.git/tree/ In particular, see merge-linux-tegra.sh and its configuration file tegra-branches.sh.dot. Also push-linux-tegra.sh does all the pushes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-01-04 08:30 +0100
Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2016-01-05 21:10 +0100
Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 21:20 +0100
Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> - 2016-01-05 21:30 +0100
Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-01-05 22:30 +0100
Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-01-05 23:40 +0100
Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> - 2016-01-06 00:00 +0100
csiph-web