Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1301559
| From | Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero |
| Date | 2016-01-05 15:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qNACT-3VY-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qLpBT-7EZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qN83U-op-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> +@script:python depends on org@ > +p << r_cmp.p; > +e << r.e = ""; > +@@ > + > +msg = "WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: %s" % (e) > +coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0], msg) > + > +@script:python depends on report@ > +p << r_cmp.p; > +e << r.e = ""; > +@@ > + > +msg = "WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: %s" % (e) > +if e: > + coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg) Is it intentional that these don't do the same thing? The report case has an if on e, while the org case does not. If you don't want a report when e doesn't have a value, you could just remove the = "" from the declaration of e. That is to give a default value of e, to allow the rule to be executed when e doesn't have a value. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v6] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2016-01-04 08:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero "Geyslan G. Bem" <geyslan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-01-05 14:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero "Geyslan G. Bem" <geyslan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero "Geyslan G. Bem" <geyslan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2016-01-05 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero "Geyslan G. Bem" <geyslan@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-01-05 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2016-01-05 15:30 +0100
[PATCH v7] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2016-01-07 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v7] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2016-01-07 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v7] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than zero Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-01-07 15:40 +0100
csiph-web