Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1300434
| From | Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the vfs tree |
| Date | 2016-01-04 02:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qN2hR-4Tf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qLD2a-7Vz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 15:24 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got a conflict in:
>
> security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 3bc8f29b149e ("new helper: memdup_user_nul()")
>
> from the vfs tree and commit:
>
> 38d859f991f3 ("IMA: policy can now be updated multiple times")
>
> from the security tree.
>
> I fixed it up (hopefully, see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> (no action is required).
Hi Stephen,
FYI, I pushed out Petko's patch to linux-integrity/next earlier today.
His patch moves taking the ima_write_mutex to after the the call to
copy_from_user(), as discussed. This obviously won't fix the conflict
with Al's patch. How do you want to handle it? Do I need to do
anything?
Thanks!
Mimi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the vfs tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2015-12-31 05:30 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the vfs tree Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-12-31 05:40 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the vfs tree Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> - 2015-12-31 11:50 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the vfs tree Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-01 05:40 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the vfs tree Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com> - 2016-01-01 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ima_write_policy() optimizations; kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-01-01 18:50 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the vfs tree Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-04 02:40 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the vfs tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-01-04 03:00 +0100
csiph-web