Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1300280
| From | "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 17/32] arm: define __smp_xxx |
| Date | 2016-01-03 10:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qMMZs-3si-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qLQLL-8pu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qLQLM-8pu-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qMsxI-7tu-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 11:24:38AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:07:59PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > This defines __smp_xxx barriers for arm, > > for use by virtualization. > > > > smp_xxx barriers are removed as they are > > defined correctly by asm-generic/barriers.h > > > > This reduces the amount of arch-specific boiler-plate code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > In combination with patch 14, this looks like it should result in no > change to the resulting code. > > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> > > My only concern is that it gives people an additional handle onto a > "new" set of barriers - just because they're prefixed with __* > unfortunately doesn't stop anyone from using it (been there with > other arch stuff before.) > > I wonder whether we should consider making the smp memory barriers > inline functions, so these __smp_xxx() variants can be undef'd > afterwards, thereby preventing drivers getting their hands on these > new macros? That'd be tricky to do cleanly since asm-generic depends on ifndef to add generic variants where needed. But it would be possible to add a checkpatch test for this. > -- > RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up > according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 17/32] arm: define __smp_xxx "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-12-31 20:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 17/32] arm: define __smp_xxx Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-02 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 17/32] arm: define __smp_xxx "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-01-03 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 17/32] arm: define __smp_xxx Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-04 14:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 17/32] arm: define __smp_xxx Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-01-04 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 17/32] arm: define __smp_xxx Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2016-01-04 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 17/32] arm: define __smp_xxx "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-01-05 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 17/32] arm: define __smp_xxx "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-01-04 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 17/32] arm: define __smp_xxx "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2016-01-04 21:20 +0100
csiph-web