Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1299601
| From | Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: Clear the vldclr if state machine is stay on FSM_VLDCLR state. |
| Date | 2015-12-31 09:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qLGMp-21W-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qIq1r-14E-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qLtma-1Ah-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qLB0m-6Cn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 31/12/15 03:09, Henry Chen wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Wed, 2015-12-30 at 19:02 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 22/12/15 08:51, Henry Chen wrote:
>>> Sometimes PMIC is too busy to send data in time to cause pmic wrap timeout,
>>> because pmic wrap is waiting for FSM_VLDCLR after finishing WACS2_CMD. It
>>> just return error when issue happened, so the state machine will stay on
>>> FSM_VLDCLR state when data send back later by PMIC and timeout again in next
>>> time because pmic wrap waiting for FSM_IDLE state at the begining of the
>>> read/write function.
>>>
>>> Clear the vldclr when timeout if state machine is stay on FSM_VLDCLR.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> index 105597a..ccd5337 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> @@ -443,10 +443,16 @@ static int pwrap_wait_for_state(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp,
>>> static int pwrap_write(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata)
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>> + u32 val;
>>>
>>> ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + /* Clear vldclr bit if state is on the WACS_FSM_WFVLDCLR */
>>> + val = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA);
>>> + if (PWRAP_GET_WACS_FSM(val) == PWRAP_WACS_FSM_WFVLDCLR)
>>> + pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR);
>>> return ret;
>>> + }
>>
>> I would prefer to have this encapsulated in a (inline) function. Maybe
>> with better description then just the one line comment.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matthias
>
> Ok, I will make the description more clear, do you means write the
> function like below and used it on pwrap_write/pwrap_read.
>
> static inline void pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
> {
> if (pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr(wrp))
> pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR);
> }
>
I didn't remind of pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr neither, nice.
Yes please use this function and add a descriptive comment on the top,
so that in the future it is clear what is happening here.
Thanks,
Matthias
>
> Thanks,
> Henry
>
>>
>>>
>>> pwrap_writel(wrp, (1 << 31) | ((adr >> 1) << 16) | wdata,
>>> PWRAP_WACS2_CMD);
>>> @@ -457,10 +463,16 @@ static int pwrap_write(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata)
>>> static int pwrap_read(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata)
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>> + u32 val;
>>>
>>> ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + /* Clear vldclr bit if state is on the WACS_FSM_WFVLDCLR */
>>> + val = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA);
>>> + if (PWRAP_GET_WACS_FSM(val) == PWRAP_WACS_FSM_WFVLDCLR)
>>> + pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR);
>>> return ret;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> pwrap_writel(wrp, (adr >> 1) << 16, PWRAP_WACS2_CMD);
>>>
>>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: Clear the vldclr if state machine is stay on FSM_VLDCLR state. Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> - 2015-12-22 09:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: Clear the vldclr if state machine is stay on FSM_VLDCLR state. Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: Clear the vldclr if state machine is stay on FSM_VLDCLR state. Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com> - 2015-12-31 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap: Clear the vldclr if state machine is stay on FSM_VLDCLR state. Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> - 2015-12-31 09:30 +0100
csiph-web