Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1298254

Re: i2c-core: One function call less in acpi_i2c_space_handler() after error detection

From SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: i2c-core: One function call less in acpi_i2c_space_handler() after error detection
Date 2015-12-26 20:40 +0100
Message-ID <qK2R4-50U-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qJQPT-5Ub-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qJR9f-6fG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qJRLX-6t9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qJSRI-77i-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qK24F-4vv-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


>> I would appreciate if an unnecessary function call can be avoided here
>> so that the affected exception handling can become also a bit more efficient.
> 
> Simpler code is easier to maintain.

There are different opinions available around the desired simplicity.


> See your patch, you didn't get it correctly at your first try.

I wonder myself about the circumstances on how my incomplete update suggestion
did happen.


> Also, this is not a hot path,

I'm curious if approaches around better exception handling can eventually become
a "hot topic".


> so I see it as a micro-optimization

I can agree to this view for this function implementation.

 
> also adding complexity.

There are the usual software development trade-offs.


> I don't favor that.

Thanks for your constructive feedback.

Is an identifier like "free_client" a bit nicer (according to the Linux coding
style recommendations) than the short jump label "err" in the discussed use case?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] i2c-core: One function call less in acpi_i2c_space_handler()  after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-26 07:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] i2c-core: One function call less in  acpi_i2c_space_handler() after error detection kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-12-26 07:50 +0100
    [PATCH v2] i2c-core: One function call less in  acpi_i2c_space_handler() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-26 08:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2] i2c-core: One function call less in  acpi_i2c_space_handler() after error detection Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2015-12-26 08:50 +0100
        Re: i2c-core: One function call less in acpi_i2c_space_handler()  after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-26 10:00 +0100
          Re: i2c-core: One function call less in acpi_i2c_space_handler()  after error detection Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2015-12-26 19:50 +0100
            Re: i2c-core: One function call less in acpi_i2c_space_handler()  after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-26 20:40 +0100

csiph-web