Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1298182
| From | SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/3] IDE-ACPI: One function call less in ide_get_dev_handle() after error detection |
| Date | 2015-12-26 11:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qJU78-82O-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qEuGl-43C-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qJU78-82O-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 10:01:36 +0100
The kfree() function was called in two cases by the
ide_get_dev_handle() function during error handling
even if the passed variable "dinfo" contained a null pointer.
* Let us return directly if a call of the function "ACPI_HANDLE"
or "acpi_get_object_info" failed.
* Delete the explicit initialisation for the variables "dinfo" and "ret"
at the beginning then.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/ide/ide-acpi.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-acpi.c b/drivers/ide/ide-acpi.c
index b694099..319b754 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-acpi.c
@@ -126,8 +126,8 @@ static int ide_get_dev_handle(struct device *dev, acpi_handle *handle,
u64 addr;
acpi_handle dev_handle;
acpi_status status;
- struct acpi_device_info *dinfo = NULL;
- int ret = -ENODEV;
+ struct acpi_device_info *dinfo;
+ int ret;
bus = pdev->bus->number;
devnum = PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn);
@@ -140,13 +140,13 @@ static int ide_get_dev_handle(struct device *dev, acpi_handle *handle,
dev_handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
if (!dev_handle) {
DEBPRINT("no acpi handle for device\n");
- goto err;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
status = acpi_get_object_info(dev_handle, &dinfo);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
DEBPRINT("get_object_info for device failed\n");
- goto err;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
if (dinfo && (dinfo->valid & ACPI_VALID_ADR) &&
dinfo->address == addr) {
@@ -157,13 +157,14 @@ static int ide_get_dev_handle(struct device *dev, acpi_handle *handle,
" address: %llu, should be %u\n",
dinfo ? (unsigned long long)dinfo->address : -1ULL,
(unsigned int)addr);
- goto err;
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto free_info;
}
DEBPRINT("for dev=0x%x.%x, addr=0x%llx, *handle=0x%p\n",
devnum, func, (unsigned long long)addr, *handle);
ret = 0;
-err:
+free_info:
kfree(dinfo);
return ret;
}
--
2.6.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/3] IDE-ACPI: Fine-tuning for a function SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-26 11:20 +0100
[PATCH 2/3] IDE-ACPI: Delete unnecessary null pointer checks in ide_get_dev_handle() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-26 11:20 +0100
[PATCH 1/3] IDE-ACPI: One function call less in ide_get_dev_handle() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-26 11:20 +0100
[PATCH 3/3] IDE-ACPI: Move an assignment for one variable in ide_get_dev_handle() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-26 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] IDE-ACPI: Fine-tuning for a function David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-12-26 19:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] IDE-ACPI: Fine-tuning for a function Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2015-12-27 00:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] IDE-ACPI: Fine-tuning for a function Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2015-12-27 07:10 +0100
csiph-web