Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1296801
| From | "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [BUG REPORT]: ARM64: perf: System hung in perf test |
| Date | 2015-12-22 15:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qIvXc-50w-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qI8nT-6V7-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qI9jX-7tH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2015/12/21 22:01, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:56:03PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote: > [SNIP] >> # /perf test -v signal >> 17: Test breakpoint overflow signal handler : >> --- start --- >> test child forked, pid 792 >> count1 11, count2 11, overflow 11 >> failed: RF EFLAG recursion issue detected >> failed: wrong overflow hit >> failed: wrong count for bp2 >> test child finished with -1 >> ---- end ---- >> Test breakpoint overflow signal handler: FAILED! > ... and this sounds like the perf tool expecting to single-step over > signal handlers, whereas (on arm64) we deliberately single-step into > them, so you can run into a loop for this case. Could you please provide me more information? Do you think it is a kernel bug and should be fixed? Or it is an invalid testcase for aarch64? Thank you. > Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[BUG REPORT]: ARM64: perf: System hung in perf test "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-12-21 14:10 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT]: ARM64: perf: System hung in perf test Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-12-21 15:10 +0100
Re: [BUG REPORT]: ARM64: perf: System hung in perf test "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-12-22 15:20 +0100
csiph-web