Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1295989
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Improve copy_page for 128 cache line sizes. |
| Date | 2015-12-21 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qI90C-77H-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qHzTb-1Jy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qI84x-6zh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Monday 21 December 2015, Will Deacon wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 04:11:18PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > Adding a check for the cache line size is not much overhead. > > Special case 128 byte cache line size. > > This improves copy_page by 85% on ThunderX compared to the > > original implementation. > > So this patch seems to: > > - Align the loop > - Increase the prefetch size > - Unroll the loop once > > Do you know where your 85% boost comes from between these? I'd really > like to avoid having multiple versions of copy_page, if possible, but > maybe we could end up with something that works well enough regardless > of cacheline size. Understanding what your bottleneck is would help to > lead us in the right direction. > > Also, how are you measuring the improvement? If you can share your > test somewhere, I can see how it affects the other systems I have access > to. A related question would be how other CPU cores are affected by the change. The test for the cache line size is going to take a few cycles, possibly a lot on certain implementations, e.g. if we ever get one where 'mrs' is microcoded or trapped by a hypervisor. Are there any possible downsides to using the ThunderX version on other microarchitectures too and skip the check? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] ARM64: Improve copy_page for 128 cache line sizes. Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com> - 2015-12-20 01:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Improve copy_page for 128 cache line sizes. Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-12-21 13:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ARM64: Improve copy_page for 128 cache line sizes. Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-12-21 14:50 +0100
csiph-web