Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1295789

Re: [RFC] theoretical race between memory hotplug and pfn iterator

From Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC] theoretical race between memory hotplug and pfn iterator
Date 2015-12-21 08:10 +0100
Message-ID <qI2Lw-3m4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qHZaV-13Z-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/21/2015 11:15 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Hello, memory-hotplug folks.
>
> I found theoretical problems between memory hotplug and pfn iterator.
> For example, pfn iterator works something like below.
>
> for (pfn = zone_start_pfn; pfn < zone_end_pfn; pfn++) {
>          if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
>                  continue;
>
>          page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>          /* Do whatever we want */
> }
>
> Sequence of hotplug is something like below.
>
> 1) add memmap (after then, pfn_valid will return valid)
> 2) memmap_init_zone()
>
> So, if pfn iterator runs between 1) and 2), it could access
> uninitialized page information.
>
> This problem could be solved by re-ordering initialization steps.
>
> Hot-remove also has a problem. If memory is hot-removed after
> pfn_valid() succeed in pfn iterator, access to page would cause NULL
> deference because hot-remove frees corresponding memmap. There is no
> guard against free in any pfn iterators.
>
> This problem can be solved by inserting get_online_mems() in all pfn
> iterators but this looks error-prone for future usage. Another idea is
> that delaying free corresponding memmap until synchronization point such
> as system suspend. It will guarantee that there is no running pfn
> iterator. Do any have a better idea?
>
> Btw, I tried to memory-hotremove with QEMU 2.5.5 but it didn't work. I
> followed sequences in doc/memory-hotplug. Do you have any comment on this?

I tried memory hot remove with qemu 2.5.5 and RHEL 7, it works well.
Maybe you can provide more details, such as guest version, err log.

Thanks,
Zhu

>
> Thanks.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
> .
>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC] theoretical race between memory hotplug and pfn iterator Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2015-12-21 04:20 +0100
  Re: [RFC] theoretical race between memory hotplug and pfn iterator Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2015-12-21 08:10 +0100
    Re: [RFC] theoretical race between memory hotplug and pfn iterator Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2015-12-21 08:20 +0100
      Re: [RFC] theoretical race between memory hotplug and pfn iterator Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> - 2015-12-21 09:10 +0100
        Re: [RFC] theoretical race between memory hotplug and pfn iterator Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 13:10 +0100

csiph-web