Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1294432

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] VFIO: capability chains

From Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] VFIO: capability chains
Date 2015-12-18 05:40 +0100
Message-ID <qGUZH-Qh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qy6dH-6Rx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qGSEy-7Qe-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qGT7A-81l-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/18/2015 01:38 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 13:05 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 11/24/2015 07:43 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> Please see the commit log and comments in patch 1 for a general
>>> explanation of the problems that this series tries to address.  The
>>> general problem is that we have several cases where we want to
>>> expose
>>> variable sized information to the user, whether it's sparse mmaps
>>> for
>>> a region, as implemented here, or DMA mapping ranges of an IOMMU,
>>> or
>>> reserved MSI mapping ranges, etc.  Extending data structures is
>>> hard;
>>> extending them to report variable sized data is really hard.  After
>>> considering several options, I think the best approach is to copy
>>> how
>>> PCI does capabilities.  This allows the ioctl to only expose the
>>> capabilities that are relevant for them, avoids data structures
>>> that
>>> are too complicated to parse, and avoids creating a new ioctl each
>>> time we think of something else that we'd like to report.  This
>>> method
>>> also doesn't preclude extensions to the fixed structure since the
>>> offset of these capabilities is entirely dynamic.
>>>
>>> Comments welcome, I'll also follow-up to the QEMU and KVM lists
>>> with
>>> an RFC making use of this for mmaps skipping over the MSI-X table.
>>> Thanks,
>>
>> Out of curiosity - could this information be exposed to the userspace
>> via
>> /sys/bus/pci/devices/xxxx:xx:xx:x/vfio_xxxx? It seems not to change
>> after
>> vfio_pci driver is bound to a device.
>
> For what purpose?  vfio doesn't have a sysfs interface, why start one?
> Thanks,

well, it could simplify debugging a bit if this information was available 
from the userspace without programming a test tool doing some ioctl()'s. 
Not a big deal though...



-- 
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] VFIO: capability chains Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> - 2015-12-18 03:10 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] VFIO: capability chains Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2015-12-18 03:40 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] VFIO: capability chains Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> - 2015-12-18 05:40 +0100

csiph-web