Re: [PATCH] locking/osq: fix ordering of node initialisation in osq_lock

From	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] locking/osq: fix ordering of node initialisation in osq_lock
Date	2015-12-17 10:50 +0100
Message-ID	<qGDma-5Zl-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qEzZn-7Cr-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qGvoC-108-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 05:18:48PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> What is the status of this patch?  It there a good likelihood that it will
> make it into v4.4?
> 
> If not, we should request that c55a6ffa6285 ("locking/osq: Relax atomic
> semantics") be reverted for v4.4

I think Peter was going to send it to mingo as an urgent fix, but I've
not seen anything from the tip-bot yet.

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] locking/osq: fix ordering of node initialisation in osq_lock David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 02:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] locking/osq: fix ordering of node initialisation in  osq_lock Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-12-17 10:50 +0100

csiph-web