Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1292342
| From | Chad Dupuis <chad.dupuis@qlogic.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] bnx2fc:Add proper locking protection in bnx2fc_ctrlr_enabled |
| Date | 2015-12-15 17:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qG0Xw-6KR-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qG0Xw-6KR-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This adds proper locking protection in bnx2fc_ctrl_enabled around
> the calls to the functions, _bnx2fc_enable and _bnx2fc_disable in
> order to avoid concurrent access on these functions accessing global
> referenced data structures in their internal intended work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> index 67405c6..e43648f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> @@ -2177,13 +2177,21 @@ static int bnx2fc_ctlr_enabled(struct fcoe_ctlr_device *cdev)
> {
> struct fcoe_ctlr *ctlr = fcoe_ctlr_device_priv(cdev);
>
> + rtnl_lock();
> + mutex_lock(&bnx2fc_dev_lock);
> switch (cdev->enabled) {
> case FCOE_CTLR_ENABLED:
> + rtnl_unlock();
> + mutex_unlock(&bnx2fc_dev_lock);
> return __bnx2fc_enable(ctlr);
> case FCOE_CTLR_DISABLED:
> + rtnl_unlock();
> + mutex_unlock(&bnx2fc_dev_lock);
> return __bnx2fc_disable(ctlr);
> case FCOE_CTLR_UNUSED:
> default:
> + rtnl_unlock();
> + mutex_unlock(&bnx2fc_dev_lock);
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> };
> }
>
Nack. All we end up protecting is the check of cdev->enabled and I do not
believe taking two mutexes is required for that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] bnx2fc:Add proper locking protection in bnx2fc_ctrlr_enabled Chad Dupuis <chad.dupuis@qlogic.com> - 2015-12-15 17:50 +0100 RE: [PATCH] bnx2fc:Add proper locking protection in bnx2fc_ctrlr_enabled Joe Carnuccio <joe.carnuccio@qlogic.com> - 2015-12-15 21:00 +0100
csiph-web