Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1291920

hidepid=2 and dumpability

From Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@odin.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject hidepid=2 and dumpability
Date 2015-12-15 09:20 +0100
Message-ID <qFSZX-1rd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


(Sorry, forgot to CC LKML yesterday, resending.)

Hi,

Could you shed some light on the implementation of 'hidepid' option for 
procfs in the Linux kernel?

As far as I can see, has_pid_permissions() eventually calls 
ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ). This way, if hidepid=2 is 
used, the ordinary users will see only those of their own processes, 
which are dumpable.

For example, the processes that changed credentials or were marked as 
non-dumpable with prctl() will remain invisible to their owners. Isn't 
that an overkill?

Or perhaps, there is a security risk if a user could read the contents 
of /proc/<pid> for these processes?

I stumbled upon this while experimenting with hidepid=2 in a Virtuozzo 
container. If I login to the container as an ordinary user via SSH, one 
of the sshd processes (owned by the user) in the container is not 
visible to that user. I checked in runtime that it is the dumpability 
check in the kernel that fails in __ptrace_may_access().

The kernel is based on the version 3.10.x, but it should not matter much 
in this case.

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Evgenii

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

hidepid=2 and dumpability Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@odin.com> - 2015-12-15 09:20 +0100

csiph-web