Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1291747
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] block: virtio-blk: support multi virt queues per virtio-blk device |
| Date | Tue, 15 Dec 2015 02:30:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qFMBc-5DF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <nsDCi-4de-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <nsDCi-4de-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ntRDc-1CH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <nu3XI-38e-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <nu3XK-38e-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <nu47o-3zk-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <nu4As-49m-55@gated-at.bofh.it> <nufma-3yJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFyHV-4U5-53@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Received | by 10.28.171.135 with SMTP id u129mr1113593wme.99.1450142805044; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:26:45 -0800 (PST) |
| X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID | <CACVXFVMe-BB_S=doiZm0XYezzrYX_E4gc8_85N4BA=g5y8fAWw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 43 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, linux-api@vger.kernel.org |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 15 Dec 2015 09:26:44 +0800 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CACVXFVMe-BB_S=doiZm0XYezzrYX_E4gc8_85N4BA=g5y8fAWw@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <1402680562-8328-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <1402680562-8328-3-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <CAJSP0QWaS--gPZ=ONFrXby1DQLw4R0RCro7bpHCdmucyjmqT_w@mail.gmail.com> <CACVXFVO0SybUKArQbKkj2+hbk6q_gt3SBooNNmw1jErRR8d07A@mail.gmail.com> <53A06475.7000308@redhat.com> <CACVXFVO6GDu7Cp=s7kn_XBE2EFnuh+XQs4UQKTFaCLi4_9jcgg@mail.gmail.com> <53A06E05.9060708@redhat.com> <CACVXFVMkV5R5GUjM7Y-U54SA-ENZZ26dbbv4K2_OYPdmmiuUqg@mail.gmail.com> <566E9A7E.3030203@redhat.com> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1291747 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi Paolo, On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 18/06/2014 06:04, Ming Lei wrote: >> For virtio-blk, I don't think it is always better to take more queues, and >> we need to leverage below things in host side: >> >> - host storage top performance, generally it reaches that with more >> than 1 jobs with libaio(suppose it is N, so basically we can use N >> iothread per device in qemu to try to get top performance) >> >> - iothreads' loading(if iothreads are at full loading, increasing >> queues doesn't help at all) >> >> In my test, I only use the current per-dev iothread(x-dataplane) >> in qemu to handle 2 vqs' notification and precess all I/O from >> the 2 vqs, and looks it can improve IOPS by ~30%. >> >> For virtio-scsi, the current usage doesn't make full use of blk-mq's >> advantage too because only one vq is active at the same time, so I >> guess the multi vqs' benefit won't be very much and I'd like to post >> patches to support that first, then provide test data with >> more queues(8, 16). > > Hi Ming Lei, > > would you like to repost these patches now that MQ support is in the kernel? > > Also, I changed my mind about moving linux-aio to AioContext. I now > think it's a good idea, because it limits the number of io_getevents > syscalls. O:-) So I would be happy to review your patches for that as well. OK, I try to figure out a new version, and it might take a while since it is close to festival season, :-) Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] block: virtio-blk: support multi virt queues per virtio-blk device Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-12-14 11:40 +0100 Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] block: virtio-blk: support multi virt queues per virtio-blk device Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2015-12-15 02:30 +0100
csiph-web