Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1291722
| From | Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 31/32] x86, pkeys: execute-only support |
| Date | 2015-12-15 01:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qFLF8-522-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <qFHBw-2sR-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFKSJ-4sB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFKSL-4sB-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFL2q-4xi-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFL2q-4xi-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 12/14/2015 03:47 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> wrote: >> On 12/14/2015 03:39 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>>> Nope. My linker-fu is weak. >>>>> >>>>> Can we even depend on the linker by itself? Even if the sections were >>>>> marked --x, we can't actually use them with those permissions unless we >>>>> have protection keys. >>>>> >>>>> Do we need some special tag on the section to tell the linker to map it >>>>> as --x under some conditions and r-x for others? >>>>> >>> Why? Wouldn't --x just end up acting like r-x if PKRU is absent? >> >> An app doing --x would expect it to be unreadable. I don't think we can >> just silently turn it in to r-x. > > I don't see why. After all, an app doing --x right now gets rx. An > app doing r-- still gets r-x on some systems. ... and you're right. I'd managed to convince myself otherwise, somehow. Let me go see if I can get the execve() code to make one of these mappings if I hand it properly-aligned sections. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 31/32] x86, pkeys: execute-only support Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2015-12-14 20:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 31/32] x86, pkeys: execute-only support Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2015-12-14 21:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 31/32] x86, pkeys: execute-only support Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2015-12-15 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 31/32] x86, pkeys: execute-only support Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2015-12-15 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 31/32] x86, pkeys: execute-only support Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-12-15 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 31/32] x86, pkeys: execute-only support Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2015-12-15 00:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 31/32] x86, pkeys: execute-only support Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2015-12-15 00:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 31/32] x86, pkeys: execute-only support Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-12-15 00:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 31/32] x86, pkeys: execute-only support Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2015-12-15 01:30 +0100
csiph-web