Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1291632
| From | Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [POWERPC] bootwrapper: One check less in fsl_get_immr() after error detection |
| Date | 2015-12-14 23:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qFJWH-3Ss-41@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qEuGl-43C-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFJDj-3JW-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 23:10 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:01:32 +0100 > > A status check was performed by the fsl_get_immr() function even if it > was known already that a system setting did not fit to the expectations. > > This implementation detail could be improved by an adjustment for > a jump label according to the Linux coding style convention. What is the actual problem you're trying to solve? Cluttering the code to micro-optimize an error path is not an improvement. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[POWERPC] bootwrapper: One check less in fsl_get_immr() after error detection SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-12-14 23:20 +0100 Re: [POWERPC] bootwrapper: One check less in fsl_get_immr() after error detection Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> - 2015-12-14 23:40 +0100
csiph-web