Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1291575
| From | Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code |
| Date | 2015-12-14 22:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qFIHg-382-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qFoIx-6Ft-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 12/14/2015 12:57 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > This series of commits is a part of a larger project to ensure > people don't reference modular support functions in non-modular > code. Overall there was roughly 5k lines of dead code in the > kernel due to this. So far we've fixed several areas, like tty, > x86, net, ... and we continue to work on other areas. > > There are several reasons to not use module support for code that > can never be built as a module, but the big ones are: > > (1) it is easy to accidentally code up unused module_exit and remove code > (2) it can be misleading when reading the source, thinking it can be > modular when the Makefile and/or Kconfig prohibit it > (3) it requires the include of the module.h header file which in turn > includes nearly everything else. > > Fortunately for cpuidle, the changes are largely trivial and change > zero runtime. All the changes here just remap the modular functions > onto the non-modular ones that they would be remapped onto anyway. > > Changes are against linux-next and compile tested on ARM allmodconfig. > I've Cc'd ARM list because all of these are used on ARM, but I'm > thinking these probably can go in via the PM tree. Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2015-12-14 01:00 +0100
[PATCH 1/3] drivers/cpuidle: make cpuidle-clps711x.c explicitly non-modular Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2015-12-14 01:00 +0100
[PATCH 3/3] drivers/cpuidle: make cpuidle-exynos.c explicitly non-modular Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2015-12-14 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-12-14 22:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2015-12-14 22:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpuidle: avoid module usage in non-modular code Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2015-12-14 22:20 +0100
csiph-web