Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1291286

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op

From Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op
Date 2015-12-14 16:40 +0100
Message-ID <qFDod-7ZC-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qF2I2-ZP-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFDod-7ZC-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


El 14/12/15 a les 16.27, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ha escrit:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 07:25:55PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Using MMUEXT_TLB_FLUSH_MULTI doesn't buy us much since the hypervisor
>> will likely perform same IPIs as would have the guest.
>>
> 
> But if the VCPU is asleep, doing it via the hypervisor will save us waking
> up the guest VCPU, sending an IPI - just to do an TLB flush
> of that CPU. Which is pointless as the CPU hadn't been running the
> guest in the first place.
> 
>>
>> More importantly, using MMUEXT_INVLPG_MULTI may not to invalidate the
>> guest's address on remote CPU (when, for example, VCPU from another
>> guest
>> is running there).
> 
> Right, so the hypervisor won't even send an IPI there.
> 
> But if you do it via the normal guest IPI mechanism (which are opaque
> to the hypervisor) you and up scheduling the guest VCPU to do
> send an hypervisor callback. And the callback will go the IPI routine
> which will do an TLB flush. Not necessary.
> 
> This is all in case of oversubscription of course. In the case where
> we are fine on vCPU resources it does not matter.
> 
> Perhaps if we have PV aware TLB flush it could do this differently?

Why don't HVM/PVH just uses the HVMOP_flush_tlbs hypercall?

Roger.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-12-13 01:30 +0100
  Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> - 2015-12-14 15:00 +0100
    Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-12-14 15:10 +0100
  Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> - 2015-12-14 16:40 +0100
    Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-12-14 17:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-12-15 15:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2015-12-15 16:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-12-15 16:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2015-12-15 16:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-12-15 16:40 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2015-12-15 17:10 +0100

csiph-web