Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1291286
| From | Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op |
| Date | 2015-12-14 16:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qFDod-7ZC-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qF2I2-ZP-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qFDod-7ZC-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
El 14/12/15 a les 16.27, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ha escrit: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 07:25:55PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> Using MMUEXT_TLB_FLUSH_MULTI doesn't buy us much since the hypervisor >> will likely perform same IPIs as would have the guest. >> > > But if the VCPU is asleep, doing it via the hypervisor will save us waking > up the guest VCPU, sending an IPI - just to do an TLB flush > of that CPU. Which is pointless as the CPU hadn't been running the > guest in the first place. > >> >> More importantly, using MMUEXT_INVLPG_MULTI may not to invalidate the >> guest's address on remote CPU (when, for example, VCPU from another >> guest >> is running there). > > Right, so the hypervisor won't even send an IPI there. > > But if you do it via the normal guest IPI mechanism (which are opaque > to the hypervisor) you and up scheduling the guest VCPU to do > send an hypervisor callback. And the callback will go the IPI routine > which will do an TLB flush. Not necessary. > > This is all in case of oversubscription of course. In the case where > we are fine on vCPU resources it does not matter. > > Perhaps if we have PV aware TLB flush it could do this differently? Why don't HVM/PVH just uses the HVMOP_flush_tlbs hypercall? Roger. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-12-13 01:30 +0100
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> - 2015-12-14 15:00 +0100
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-12-14 15:10 +0100
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> - 2015-12-14 16:40 +0100
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-12-14 17:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-12-15 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2015-12-15 16:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-12-15 16:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2015-12-15 16:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-12-15 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2015-12-15 17:10 +0100
csiph-web