Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1291282

Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant?

From One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant?
Date 2015-12-14 16:30 +0100
Message-ID <qFDez-7Vd-49@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qFCiu-7lj-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Intel Corporation

Show all headers | View raw


> So it's been quite some time since this topic was covered in any
> capacity, and it's worth asking now: does it make sense to keep this
> ancient security bit around?  Does it make a modicum of improvement to

Yes.

> Is there disagreement on my views or points?

Yes 8)

You don't really want someone racing you to set up a fake ssh service on
your system to steal all the passwords do you ?

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is PROT_SOCK still relevant? Jason Newton <nevion@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 15:30 +0100
  Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant? One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2015-12-14 16:30 +0100
    Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant? Jason Newton <nevion@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 17:20 +0100
      Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant? "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 19:40 +0100
      Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant? One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2015-12-14 20:50 +0100
        Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant? Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 21:20 +0100
        Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant? Jason Newton <nevion@gmail.com> - 2015-12-14 21:50 +0100
          Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant? Jason Newton <nevion@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 16:00 +0100
            Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant? "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 18:10 +0100
            Re: Is PROT_SOCK still relevant? Jason Newton <nevion@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 20:10 +0100

csiph-web